Luis F Aragón-Vargas, Julián C Garzón-Mosquera, Johnny A Montoya-Arroyo
Journal: International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism 2024;34(5):258-266
PMID: 38789098
Dehydration during prolonged exercise in the heat is a common occurrence requiring fluid and electrolyte ingestion to maintain homeostasis and prevent muscle fatigue, cramping, and heat exhaustion. Gastric emptying of ingested beverages plays a key role in rehydration effectiveness, representing a first barrier to the absorption process. This study aimed to evaluate the rehydration effectiveness, and gastrointestinal (GI) tolerance of skimmed, lactose-free milk (SLM) compared to water and sports drink (SD) following moderate-intensity cycling in the heat. This study was a randomised, controlled trial involving physically active college students (n = 16) aged 18–40 years old. Results showed that: - SLM showed greater fluid retention over the 3-hour follow-up period compared to water and SD. - SLM presented low-intensity GI symptoms like those with water and SD. - SLM was effective in maintaining fluid balance, making it a viable option for postexercise rehydration. Authors concluded that SLM is more effective than water and similar to a conventional SD for post-exercise rehydration.
Postexercise hydration is fundamental to replace fluid loss from sweat. This study evaluated rehydration and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms for each of three beverages: water (W), sports drink (SD), and skimmed, lactose-free milk (SLM) after moderate-intensity cycling in the heat. Sixteen college students completed three exercise sessions each to lose ≈2% of their body mass. They drank 150% of body mass loss of the drink assigned in randomized order; net fluid balance, diuresis, and GI symptoms were measured and followed up for 3 hr after completion of fluid intake. SLM showed higher fluid retention (∼69%) versus W (∼40%; p < .001); SD (∼56%) was not different from SLM or W (p > .05). Net fluid balance was higher for SLM (-0.26 kg) and SD (-0.42 kg) than W (-0.67 kg) after 3 hr (p < .001), resulting from a significantly lower diuresis with SLM. Reported GI disturbances were mild and showed no difference among drinks (p > .05) despite ingestion of W (1,992 ± 425 ml), SD (1,999 ± 429 ml), and SLM (1,993 ± 426 ml) in 90 min. In conclusion, SLM was more effective than W for postexercise rehydration, showing greater fluid retention for the 3-hr follow-up and presenting with low-intensity GI symptoms similar to those with W and SD. These results confirm that SLM is an effective option for hydration after exercise in the heat.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.