Skimmed, Lactose-Free Milk Ingestion Postexercise: Rehydration Effectiveness and Gastrointestinal Disturbances Versus Water and a Sports Drink in Physically Active People.

Luis F Aragón-Vargas, Julián C Garzón-Mosquera, Johnny A Montoya-Arroyo

Journal: International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism 2024;34(5):258-266

PMID: 38789098

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Dehydration during prolonged exercise in the heat is a common occurrence requiring fluid and electrolyte ingestion to maintain homeostasis and prevent muscle fatigue, cramping, and heat exhaustion. Gastric emptying of ingested beverages plays a key role in rehydration effectiveness, representing a first barrier to the absorption process. This study aimed to evaluate the rehydration effectiveness, and gastrointestinal (GI) tolerance of skimmed, lactose-free milk (SLM) compared to water and sports drink (SD) following moderate-intensity cycling in the heat. This study was a randomised, controlled trial involving physically active college students (n = 16) aged 18–40 years old. Results showed that: - SLM showed greater fluid retention over the 3-hour follow-up period compared to water and SD. - SLM presented low-intensity GI symptoms like those with water and SD. - SLM was effective in maintaining fluid balance, making it a viable option for postexercise rehydration. Authors concluded that SLM is more effective than water and similar to a conventional SD for post-exercise rehydration.

Abstract

Postexercise hydration is fundamental to replace fluid loss from sweat. This study evaluated rehydration and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms for each of three beverages: water (W), sports drink (SD), and skimmed, lactose-free milk (SLM) after moderate-intensity cycling in the heat. Sixteen college students completed three exercise sessions each to lose ≈2% of their body mass. They drank 150% of body mass loss of the drink assigned in randomized order; net fluid balance, diuresis, and GI symptoms were measured and followed up for 3 hr after completion of fluid intake. SLM showed higher fluid retention (∼69%) versus W (∼40%; p < .001); SD (∼56%) was not different from SLM or W (p > .05). Net fluid balance was higher for SLM (-0.26 kg) and SD (-0.42 kg) than W (-0.67 kg) after 3 hr (p < .001), resulting from a significantly lower diuresis with SLM. Reported GI disturbances were mild and showed no difference among drinks (p > .05) despite ingestion of W (1,992 ± 425 ml), SD (1,999 ± 429 ml), and SLM (1,993 ± 426 ml) in 90 min. In conclusion, SLM was more effective than W for postexercise rehydration, showing greater fluid retention for the 3-hr follow-up and presenting with low-intensity GI symptoms similar to those with W and SD. These results confirm that SLM is an effective option for hydration after exercise in the heat.

Address: Human Movement Science Research Center (CIMOHU-UCR), University of Costa Rica (UCR), San Jose, Costa Rica.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.