The effect of a bodybuilding carbohydrate-loading protocol on anthropometry: Preliminary findings from a randomized crossover trial.

Kai A Homer, Ivan Jukic, Matt R Cross, Eric R Helms

Journal: Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) 2024;127():112528

PMID: 39154549

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

In competition, bodybuilders are subjectively judged and ranked on variables such as muscle size and conditioning (low body fat). To acutely enhance these variables, athletes typically alter nutritional and training practices in the week before competition, known as peak week (PW). The primary aim was to evaluate the impact of a bodybuilding carbohydrate (CHO)-loading protocol on body mass, skinfold thickness, and muscle thickness. This study was a randomised crossover trial involving four male bodybuilders with very low body fat. Each participant underwent both the CHO-loading and placebo protocols in different periods. Results showed that the CHO-loading protocol resulted in increases in muscle thickness and body mass and decreases in skinfold thickness (SF) from baseline; however, these differences may not be large enough to be considered meaningful. Authors concluded that based on their findings, coaches and competitors should opt to individualise and refine protocols by testing them before competition and visually assessing changes in physique.

Abstract

To acutely enhance muscle size and definition, carbohydrate (CHO)-loading protocols are commonly implemented by bodybuilders in the week before competition. This study sought to evaluate the effects of a bodybuilding CHO-loading protocol on anthropometry. Four dieting males engaging in resistance training (RT) with very low body fat participated in this randomized crossover trial. Each experimental period consisted of data collection on days one, four, and five corresponding to baseline, postdepletion, and postloading phases, respectively. During depletion, a standardized RT regimen and diet was followed. This diet was maintained on day 4 with the addition of placebo (PLA) or CHO drinks which contained 9 g/kg BM CHO for postloading data collection on day 5. Body mass (BM), skinfold thickness (SF), and ultrasound muscle thickness (MT) were obtained with descriptive data at both group and individual level calculated. From baseline, BM, SF, and MT mostly decreased in both conditions following depletion. All outcomes then increased from postdepletion following CHO-loading (BM: +0.8%, SF: +1.1%, MT: +2.9%) but not with PLA. Comparing to baseline, postloading changes were greater with CHO (BM: +0.3%, SF: -2.3%, MT: +2.1%) than PLA (BM: -0.9%, SF: -0.5%, MT: -0.8%). Individual differences in response to each phase were also observed. Group level changes seemingly favor CHO-loading; however, it is difficult to judge whether these changes are practically meaningful as they may not be large enough to exceed measurement error and daily biological fluctuations. Before implementation, coaches and competitors should consider individualizing protocols through precompetition testing and visually assessing changes in physique.

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: [email protected].; Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand; Division of Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.; Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.; Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand; Florida Atlantic University, Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Muscle Physiology Laboratory, Boca Raton, Florida, United States.

Patient Centred Factor

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.