Post-Antibiotic Gut Mucosal Microbiome Reconstitution Is Impaired by Probiotics and Improved by Autologous FMT.

David Zeevi, Eran Elinav, Eran Segal, Zamir Halpern, Itai Sharon, Hagit Shapiro, Meirav Pevsner-Fischer, Oren Shibolet, Nitsan Maharshak, Shalev Itzkovitz, Alon Harmelin, Eran Kotler, Tal Korem, Jotham Suez, Andreas E Moor, Yotam Cohen, Max Horn, Sara Federici, Rotem Ben-Zeev Brik, Dana Regev-Lehavi, Maya Zur, Stavros Bashiardes, Mally Dori-Bachash, Uria Mor, Gili Zilberman-Schapira, Niv Zmora

Journal: Cell 2019;174(6):1406-1423.e16

PMID: 30193113

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Probiotics are commonly used to reduce the risk of antibiotic associated diarrhoea (AAD). This study, in both mice and humans, investigated the effects of an 11 strain probiotic supplement and autologous faecal microbiome transplantation (aFMT) after antibiotic treatment. (Autologous meaning the person’s own, pre-antibiotic stool was transplanted.) Gut mucosa samples along the digestive tract and stool samples were investigated for microbiome composition and activity (transcriptome). The investigators found that without antibiotics the probiotics did not colonise very well, suggesting that our native microbiome offers resistance. After antibiotics, which would kill off much of our gut bacteria,the probiotics colonise the gut mucosa much better. However, the probiotics appear to then prevent the microbiome to return to its native, pre-antibiotic state. Whilst in those with the aFMT and in those who did nothing (“watchful waiting”) the microbiome returned to pre-antibiotic state fairly quickly, in the probiotic group even after 5 months the microbiome had not returned to its native composition. In vitro experiments suggest that the delay in the probiotic group is due to substances secreted by the probiotic bacteria, in particular Lactobacilli. The authors conclude that the potential benefits in terms of reducing the risk of AAD with probiotics may be offset with a delay in reconstitution of the native microbiome, and call for more research into aFMT and a more personalised approach to probiotic therapy.

Abstract

Probiotics are widely prescribed for prevention of antibiotics-associated dysbiosis and related adverse effects. However, probiotic impact on post-antibiotic reconstitution of the gut mucosal host-microbiome niche remains elusive. We invasively examined the effects of multi-strain probiotics or autologous fecal microbiome transplantation (aFMT) on post-antibiotic reconstitution of the murine and human mucosal microbiome niche. Contrary to homeostasis, antibiotic perturbation enhanced probiotics colonization in the human mucosa but only mildly improved colonization in mice. Compared to spontaneous post-antibiotic recovery, probiotics induced a markedly delayed and persistently incomplete indigenous stool/mucosal microbiome reconstitution and host transcriptome recovery toward homeostatic configuration, while aFMT induced a rapid and near-complete recovery within days of administration. In vitro, Lactobacillus-secreted soluble factors contributed to probiotics-induced microbiome inhibition. Collectively, potential post-antibiotic probiotic benefits may be offset by a compromised gut mucosal recovery, highlighting a need of developing aFMT or personalized probiotic approaches achieving mucosal protection without compromising microbiome recolonization in the antibiotics-perturbed host.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Immunology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel.; Immunology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel; Internal Medicine Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel.; Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel.; Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel; Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel.; Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel.; Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel; Research Center for Digestive tract and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.; Migal Galilee Research Institute, 11016 Kiryat Shmona, Israel; Tel Hai College, Upper Galilee, 1220800, Israel.; Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel; Research Center for Digestive tract and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel; Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel. Electronic address: [email protected].; Immunology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.