Experimental validation of a micro-CT finite element model of a human cadaveric mandible rehabilitated with short-implant-supported partial dentures.

Lana Zupancic Cepic, Martin Frank, Andreas G Reisinger, Benedikt Sagl, Dieter H Pahr, Werner Zechner, Andreas Schedle

Journal: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2022;126():105033

PMID: 34933158

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to address the predictive value of a micro-computed tomography (μCT)-based finite element (μFE) model of a human cadaveric edentulous posterior mandible, rehabilitated by short dental implants. Hereby, three different prosthetic/implant configurations of fixed partial dentures ("Sp"-3 splinted crowns on 3 implants, "Br" - Bridge: 3 splinted crowns on 2 implants, and "Si"- 3 single crowns) were analysed by comparing the computational predictions of the global stiffness with experimental data.

METHODS

Experimental displacement of the bone/implant/prosthesis system was measured under axial and oblique loads of 100 N using an optical deformation system (GOM Aramis) and the overall movement of the testing machine (Zwick Z030). Together with the measured machine force, an "Aramis" (optical markers) and "Zwick" (test machine) stiffness were calculated. FE models were created based on μCT-scans of the cadaveric mandible sample (n = 1) before and after implantation and using stl-files of the crowns. The same load tests and boundary conditions were simulated on the models and the μFE-results were compared to experimental data using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The regression line through a plot of pooled stiffness values (N/mm) for the optical displacement recording (true local displacement) and the test machine (machine compliance included) had a slope of 0.57 and a correlation coefficient R of 0.82. The average pooled correlation of global stiffness between the experiment and FE-analysis (FEA) showed a R of 0.80, but the FEA-stiffness was 7.2 times higher. The factor was highly dependent on the test configuration. Sp-configuration showed the largest stiffness followed by Br-configuration (17% difference in experiment and 21% in FEA).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed good qualitative agreement between the experimental and predicted global stiffness of different short implant configurations. It could be deduced that 1:1 splinting of the short implants by the crowns is most favorable for the stiffness of the implant/prosthesis system. However, in the clinical context, the absolute in silico readings must be interpreted cautiously, as the FEA showed a considerable overestimation of the values.

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Prosthodontics, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.; Institute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, 1090, Vienna, Austria.; Institute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Department of Anatomy und Biomechanics, Division Biomechanics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500, Krems, Austria.; Center of Clinical Research, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.; Department of Anatomy und Biomechanics, Division Biomechanics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500, Krems, Austria. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.; Competence Center for Dental Materials, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.