Long-term therapeutic effect of eslicarbazepine acetate in children: An open-label extension of a cognition study in children aged 6-16 years.

Pierangelo Veggiotti, Sergiusz Józwiak, Fenella Kirkham, Joana Moreira, Ana Pereira, Fábio Ikedo, Helena Gama

Journal: Epilepsy & behavior : E&B 2022;127():108515

PMID: 34991056

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In Europe, eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is approved as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of focal seizures (FS) in children aged >6 years. In the US, ESL is approved as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy for the treatment of FS in patients aged ≥4 years. In a phase II study of children aged 6-16 years with FS, ESL had no significant effects on attention or behavioral functioning and decreased seizure frequency during double-blind therapy and a 1-year open-label extension (OLE). This report presents data from an additional 2-year OLE of the phase II study.

METHODS

Previous recipients of ESL or placebo were treated with open-label ESL (10-30 mg/kg/day, adjusted for clinical response and/or adverse events [AEs]). Safety was assessed by incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). Efficacy endpoints were treatment retention time and change from baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale scores.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients entered and 31 (73.8%) completed the 2-year OLE. Median treatment retention time was 735 (95% confidence interval 728-741) days. Seven patients (17% of total, 23% of completed) experienced ≥1 TEAE during the 2-year OLE, mostly of mild or moderate intensity. The incidence of serious TEAEs was low (n = 2; 5% of total, 6% of completed) and none were related to ESL. One child was withdrawn because of splenomegaly that was considered possibly related to ESL. The only change from baseline in CGI-S was a 0.5-point reduction in the severity of illness score. All findings were consistent across patient subgroups based on previous double-blind treatment (placebo or ESL) and patient age (6-11 or 12-16 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients remained on ESL during the 2-year OLE, and treatment efficacy was maintained. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of ESL, and no new safety signals were identified.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Pediatric Neurology Unit, Vittore Buzzi Hospital Milan, Via Castelvetro, 32 - Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi - Pad. A 20154, Milan, Italy; Child Neuropsychiatry Chair, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.; Department of Child Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Al. Zwirki i Wigury 63a, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.; University Hospital, Southampton, UK; University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK; King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.; BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457 S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal.; BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457 S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.