Evaluating the Findings of the IMPACT-C Randomized Clinical Trial to Improve COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Sarah D Berry, Keith S Goldfeld, Kevin McConeghy, David Gifford, H Edward Davidson, Lisa Han, Maggie Syme, Ashvin Gandhi, Susan L Mitchell, Jill Harrison, Amy Recker, Kimberly S Johnson, Stefan Gravenstein, Vincent Mor

Journal: JAMA internal medicine 2022;182(3):324-331

PMID: 35099523

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Identifying successful strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccination among skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents and staff is integral to preventing future outbreaks in a continually overwhelmed system.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a multicomponent vaccine campaign would increase vaccine rates among SNF residents and staff.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a cluster randomized trial with a rapid timeline (December 2020-March 2021) coinciding with the Pharmacy Partnership Program (PPP). It included 133 SNFs in 4 health care systems across 16 states: 63 and 70 facilities in the intervention and control arms, respectively, and participants included 7496 long-stay residents (>100 days) and 17 963 staff.

INTERVENTIONS

Multicomponent interventions were introduced at the facility level that included: (1) educational material and electronic messaging for staff; (2) town hall meetings with frontline staff (nurses, nurse aides, dietary, housekeeping); (3) messaging from community leaders; (4) gifts (eg, T-shirts) with socially concerned messaging; (5) use of a specialist to facilitate consent with residents' proxies; and (6) funds for additional COVID-19 testing of staff/residents.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes of this study were the proportion of residents (from electronic medical records) and staff (from facility logs) who received a COVID-19 vaccine (any), examined as 2 separate outcomes. Mixed-effects generalized linear models with a binomial distribution were used to compare outcomes between arms, using intent-to-treat approach. Race was examined as an effect modifier in the resident outcome model.

RESULTS

Most facilities were for-profit (95; 71.4%), and 1973 (26.3%) of residents were Black. Among residents, 82.5% (95% CI, 81.2%-83.7%) were vaccinated in the intervention arm, compared with 79.8% (95% CI, 78.5%-81.0%) in the usual care arm (marginal difference 0.8%; 95% CI, -1.9% to 3.7%). Among staff, 49.5% (95% CI, 48.4%-50.6%) were vaccinated in the intervention arm, compared with 47.9% (95% CI, 46.9%-48.9%) in usual care arm (marginal difference: -0.4%; 95% CI, -4.2% to 3.1%). There was no association of race with the outcome among residents.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A multicomponent vaccine campaign did not have a significant effect on vaccination rates among SNF residents or staff. Among residents, vaccination rates were high. However, half the staff remained unvaccinated despite these efforts. Vaccination campaigns to target SNF staff will likely need to use additional approaches.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04732819.

Address: Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts.; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.; Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.; Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.; Providence Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.; Center for Health Policy and Evaluation in Long-Term Care, American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living, Washington, DC.; Insight Therapeutics, Norfolk, Virginia.; University of California, Los Angeles Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles.; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.; Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.