Thilo Deckersbach, Andrew A Nierenberg, Susan L McElroy, Louisa G Sylvia, Michael J Ostacher, Dan V Iosifescu, Edward S Friedman, Terence A Ketter, James H Kocsis, Mauricio Tohen, Melvin McInnis, Michael Thase, Joseph R Calabrese, Charles L Bowden, Sophie Greenebaum, Nevita George, Alec P Shannon, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Maya Kuperberg, Richard C Shelton
Journal: Journal of affective disorders 2022;300():41-49
PMID: 34952123
BACKGROUND
Patients with bipolar disorder have higher rates of cardiometabolic comorbidities and mortality. Although guidelines emphasize the importance of cardiovascular monitoring, few studies characterized the cardiometabolic risk profile during treatment and their relation to symptomatology and treatment response.
METHODS
We analyzed data from two similar 24-weeks comparative effectiveness trials, with a combined sample of 770 participants randomized to two different lithium doses, quetiapine (300 mg/day), or standard treatment without lithium. Glucose, lipids and vital signs were measured before and after 24 weeks of treatment. We calculated several cardiovascular risk scores, assessed baseline correlations and compared the four treatment arms via multiple linear regression models.
RESULTS
Higher cholesterol and LDL levels were associated with greater depression severity, showing differential correlations to specific symptoms, particularly agitation, low energy and suicidality. Those randomized to quetiapine showed a significant worsening of cardiometabolic markers during the 24-week trial. Neither baseline nor change in lipid levels correlated with differential treatment response.
LIMITATIONS
Study duration was short from the perspective of cardiometabolic risk markers, and all treatment arms included patients taking adjunct antipsychotics. The trials compared quetiapine to lithium, but not to other medications known to affect similar risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with 300 mg/day quetiapine for 24 weeks, representing a short and common dose course, resulted in increased cardiometabolic risk markers, emphasizing the importance of monitoring during mood-stabilizing treatment. The symptom-specific associations are in line with previous studies in unipolar depression, suggesting a cardiometabolic-depression link that needs to be further studied in bipolar depression.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.