Incidence and preventability of hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in France: A prospective observational study (IATROSTAT).

Marie-Laure Laroche, Sophie Gautier, Elisabeth Polard, Marie-Blanche Rabier, Laurent Chouchana, Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes, Jean-Luc Faillie, Nadine Petitpain, Laurence Lagarce, Annie-Pierre Jonville-Bera

Journal: British journal of clinical pharmacology 2022;89(1):390-400

PMID: 36002314

Abstract

AIMS

In the last French study in 2007, the incidence of hospital admissions (HAs) related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 3.6%. The objective was to assess the current ADR-HA incidence in France and to describe both its characteristics and preventability.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre study was conducted among randomly selected French public hospital medical wards (April-July 2018). Patients admitted during a week period were included. ADR-HA cases were collected by the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres network. An independent committee validated potential cases and ADR preventability.

RESULTS

ADR-HA incidence was 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-9.4%), increasing with age (3.3% [95%CI: 1.8-5.5%] ≤16 y vs. 10.6% [95%CI: 9.3-12.0%] ≥65 y). The most common ADRs were haemorrhagic events (8.8%), haematological disorders (6.5%), acute renal failure (6.3%), fluid and electrolyte disorders (6.0%), and falls (5.2%). New drugs were involved: targeted therapies (22.8% of antineoplastics), direct oral anticoagulants (29.6% of antithrombotics) and incretin-based drugs (20.0% of antidiabetics). ADRs were preventable in 16.1% of cases because the drugs involved had not been used in accordance with monographies, package leaflets or other therapeutic guidelines. The main situations of noncompliance addressed either dose or duration of use (27.9%), warning (23.2%), use precaution (18.6%) and inappropriate self-medication or misuse by patients (11.6%).

CONCLUSION

In France, ADR-HA incidence dramatically increased over the last decade. A significant proportion was related to new pharmacological classes and considered as preventable. These findings should lead to in-depth thought on preventive actions on at-risk drug classes.

© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.

Address: Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Limoges, Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.; UR 24134 (VieSanté- Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, e-Santé), IFR OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Lille, Pharmacology Department, CHU Lille, Lille, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Rennes, CHU Rennes, Rennes, Francie, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Besançon, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Cochin, Pharmacology Department, AP-HP. Centre - Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Pitié and Saint Antoine Hospital, APHP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.; IDESP, Univ. Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Nancy, CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France.; Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU Angers, Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre of Angers, Angers, France.; Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre - Centre-Val de Loire, Pharmacosurveillance Unit, CHRU Tours, Tours, France.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.