Lifestyle-, environmental-, and additional health factors associated with an increased sperm DNA fragmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Szilárd Váncsa, Péter Hegyi, Anett Szabó, Alex Váradi, Attila Forintos, Teodóra Filipov, Júlia Ács, Nándor Ács, Tibor Szarvas, Péter Nyirády, Zsolt Kopa

Journal: Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E 2023;21(1):5

PMID: 36653793

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

The World Health Organization defines infertility as regular unprotected sexual intercourse without achieving conception within a year. In recent years, there has been a growing demand for functional, objective parameters reflecting fertility status more clearly than classical parameters. Of these, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and the DNA fragmentation index – denoting the percentage of sperm with damaged DNA – seem to be of utmost importance. The aim of this study was to investigate all risk factors that may potentially be increasing SDF. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of one hundred and ninety articles. The earliest studies were published in 2003, and the latest in 2021. Results show that several modifiable risk factors negatively affect SDF, namely; a. health conditions: varicocele [when veins become enlarged inside the pouch of skin that holds the testicles] and impaired glucose tolerance, b. infections: Chlamydia, c. malignancies: testicular tumours, and d. lifestyle factors: smoking, alcohol consumption and body mass index. Authors conclude that several lifestyle-, environmental-, and additional health factors are associated with increased SDF.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Infertility affects one in every six couples in developed countries, and approximately 50% is of male origin. In 2021, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing became an evidence-based test for fertility evaluations depicting fertility more clearly than standard semen parameters. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the potential prognostic factors of a higher SDF.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in three medical databases and included studies investigating any risk factors for SDF values. We calculated mean differences (MD) in SDF with 95% confidence interval (CI) for exposed and non-exposed individuals.

RESULTS

We included 190 studies in our analysis. In the group of associated health conditions, varicocele (MD = 13.62%, CI: 9.39-17.84) and impaired glucose tolerance (MD = 13.75%, CI: 6.99-20.51) had the most significant increase in SDF. Among malignancies, testicular tumors had the highest impact, with a maximum of MD = 11.3% (CI: 7.84-14.76). Among infections, the overall effects of both Chlamydia and HPV were negligible. Of lifestyle factors, smoking had the most disruptive effect on SDF - an increase of 9.19% (CI: 4.33-14.06). Different periods of sexual abstinence did not show significant variations in SDF values. Age seemed to have a more drastic effect on SDF from age 50 onwards, with a mean difference of 12.58% (CI: 7.31-17.86). Pollution also had a detrimental effect - 9.68% (CI: 6.85-12.52).

CONCLUSION

Of the above risk factors, varicocele, impaired glucose tolerance, testicular tumors, smoking, pollution, and paternal age of over 50 were associated with the highest SDF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42021282533.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői Ut 78/B, Budapest, H-1082, Hungary.; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.; Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.; Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.; Department of Interventional Radiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.; Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany.; Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllői Ut 78/B, Budapest, H-1082, Hungary. [email protected].; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.