Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review.

Anna Peeters, Feby Savira, Adyya Gupta, Cecily Gilbert, Catherine E Huggins, Colette Browning, Wendy Chapman, Terry Haines

Journal: Journal of medical Internet research 2023;25():e38081

PMID: 36652291

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a rapid shift toward the adoption of virtual health care services in Australia. It is unknown how widely virtual care has been implemented or evaluated for the care of older adults in Australia.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to review the literature evaluating virtual care initiatives for older adults across a wide range of health conditions and modalities and identify key challenges and opportunities for wider adoption at both patient and system levels in Australia.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, and gray literature (January 1, 2011, to March 8, 2021) to identify virtual care initiatives for older Australians (aged ≥65 years). The results were reported according to the World Health Organization's digital health evaluation framework.

RESULTS

Among the 6296 documents in the search results, we identified 94 that reported 80 unique virtual care initiatives. Most (69/80, 89%) were at the pilot stage and targeted community-dwelling older adults (64/79, 81%) with chronic diseases (52/80, 65%). The modes of delivery included videoconference, telephone, apps, device or monitoring systems, and web-based technologies. Most initiatives showed either similar or better health and behavioral outcomes compared with in-person care. The key barriers for wider adoption were physical, cognitive, or sensory impairment in older adults and staffing issues, legislative issues, and a lack of motivation among providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual care is a viable model of care to address a wide range of health conditions among older adults in Australia. More embedded and integrative evaluations are needed to ensure that virtually enabled care can be used more widely by older Australians and health care providers.

©Feby Savira, Adyya Gupta, Cecily Gilbert, Catherine E Huggins, Colette Browning, Wendy Chapman, Terry Haines, Anna Peeters. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 18.01.2023.

Address: Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.; Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.; Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; Health Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia.; Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia.; National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.; School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.; Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.