Clinical Outcomes of Medical Management Options for Chronic Anal Fissures in a Long-Term Follow-up: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fernando Sierra-Arango, José de la Hoz-Valle, Juan Pablo Espinosa, José Moreno-Montoya, Mariana Vásquez Roldan, Erika D Pérez-Riveros

Journal: Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 2023;41(5):822-832

PMID: 36646066

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Topical treatments and botulinum toxin injections are valid options for the management of patients with chronic anal fissures (CAF), but little is known about the efficacy of these techniques in long-term follow-up. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness, given to clinical outcomes, of medical treatments with calcium antagonists, nitroglycerin, and botulinum toxin on CAF treatment in adults.

METHOD

A systemic review and meta-analysis developed according to PRISMA [PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100; BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332] and registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42020120386). A systematic literature search was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized control trials that compared medical treatment were identified; publications had to have a clinical definition of CAF with at least one of the following signs or symptoms: visible sphincter fibers at the base of the fissure, anal papillae, sentinel piles, and indurated margins. The symptoms had to be chronic for at least 4 weeks. Data were independently extracted for each study, and a meta-analysis was drawn using fixed- and random-effects models.

RESULTS

17 randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. Diltiazem showed a superior effect compared with glycerin (RR = 1.16 [95% CI = 1.05-1.30]; I2 = 18%) and with fewer adverse effects (RR = 0.13 [95% CI = 0.04-0.042]; I2 = 87%). Similar results were evidenced with the use of nifedipine compared with lidocaine (RR = 4.53 [95% CI = 2.99-6.86]; I2 = 28%). Botulinum toxin did not show statistically significant differences compared to glycerin (RR = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.02-29.36]; I2 = 93%) or isosorbide dinitrate (RR = 1.45 [95% CI = 0.32-6.54]; I2 = 85%). Regarding recurrence, nifedipine was superior to lidocaine (RR = 0.18 [95% CI = 0.08-0.44]; I2 = 31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium channel blockers performed well regarding the healing of CAF when compared to others in long-term follow-up. The superiority of botulinum toxin was not evidenced compared to topical treatments. More studies are needed to better assess recurrence rates.

© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Address: Director of Clinical Studies and Clinical Epidemiology Division, Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.; Head of Clinical Studies and Clinical Epidemiology Division, Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.; School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.; Statistics and Mathematics, Epidemiologist of Clinical Studies and Clinical Epidemiology Division, Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.; Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá D.C., Colombia, [email protected].; Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.