The Effect of Regular Consumption of Reformulated Breads on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Lukas Schwingshackl, Anette E Buyken, Alena M Schadow, Ingrid Revheim, Ulrike Spielau, Jutta Dierkes, Jan Frank, Jonathan M Hodgson, André Moreira-Rosário, Chris J Seal, Hanne Rosendahl-Riise

Journal: Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) 2023;14(1):30-43

PMID: 36811592

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

The metabolic effect of bread depends on several qualitative aspects ranging from the type of grain, the amount of carbohydrates, levels of other nutrients, as well as the chemical structure and processing. The aim of this study was to assess the certainty of the evidence and to investigate the overall effect of regular consumption of reformulated breads on glycaemic control in the following groups: a) healthy adults; b) those at risk of developing cardiometabolic disease (e.g., having hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hypercholesterolemia and/or overweight/obesity); and c) those with manifest type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies and 23 distinct study populations. All studies were randomised controlled trials, 12 of which had a crossover design and 10 had a parallel design. In total, 1037 participants were included. These provided 669 and 595 data points for intervention and control comparisons, respectively. Results show a beneficial effect of reformulated bread variants on fasting blood glucose concentrations. This benefit may be more pronounced among people with manifest T2DM (low certainty of evidence). Authors conclude that bread quality is relevant for metabolic health among adults and that future studies should address its relevance among people at risk of T2DM.

Expert Review

Reviewer: Kirsty Baxter
20th Jul 2023
plain language summary logo

Conflict of interest

None

Take home message

This study’s findings suggest the effect of reformulated breads high in dietary fibre, whole grains, and/or functional ingredients may be more beneficial than regular breads on fasting blood glucose concentrations in adults, primarily among those with T2DM. Reformulated breads however, did not lower fasting insulin concentrations, HOMA-IR and HbA1C when compared to regular bread.

Evidence category

A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)

Summary review

Overview This study evaluated the effect of regular consumption of “reformulated breads” on glycemic control among healthy adults, adults at cardiometabolic risk or with manifest T2DM in 22 RCTs with 1037 participants. Compared with “regular” or comparator bread, consumption of reformulated intervention breads yielded lower fasting blood glucose concentrations only among people with T2DM (low certainty of evidence), yet no differences in fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, or postprandial glucose response were identified. [*’reformulated bread’ as defined by the World Health Organisation of altering the processing or composition of a food to improve its nutritional profile, and contained whole-grains and dietary fibre]

Results

Sub group analysis revealed that the effect of reformulated breads high in dietary fibre, whole grains, and/or functional ingredients on lowering fasting blood glucose was confined to participants with T2DM, with no significant effect among participants without T2DM (0.68 mmol/L; 95% CI: 1.11, 0.36; I2 1⁄4 57% and 0.04 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.05; I2 1⁄4 25%, respectively; P < 0.001).

Subgroup analyses by continent revealed a more pronounced effect on fasting blood glucose concentrations in studies conducted in Asia and the Middle East compared with studies conducted in Europe, North America, and Oceania (MD: 0.84 mmol/L; 95% CI: 1.35, 0.33; I2 1⁄4 52% and MD: 0.04 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.03; I2 1⁄4 0%, respectively; P < 0.001)

Additional subgroup analyses found that the type of control bread, but not the type of intervention bread, affected the pooled effect estimate of fasting blood glucose concentration (P 1⁄4 0.03), with the largest difference reported in studies not describing the control bread used.

Limitations Publication bias was considered negligible for the studies included in this meta-analysis, and the risk of bias assessment revealed that most of the studies had some concerns of risk of bias. One author is a member of the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium and another is a member of the GRADE working group.

Strengths This systematic review and meta-analysis include the focus on high-quality intervention studies (i.e., RCTs using either crossover or parallel design) and the inclusion of longer-term studies (>2 wk) to address the effectiveness of regular bread replacement for glycemic control in everyday life.

Clinical practice applications

  • This data suggests that bread quality is relevant for metabolic health among adults at risk of T2DM. In particular, reformulated breads were found to have a more beneficial impact than regular breads on fasting blood glucose concentrations in adults with TsDM. However, consumption of the reformulated bread (enriched with dietary fiber, whole grains, or functional ingredients) did not lower fasting insulin concentrations compared with the control breads (MD: 1.59 pmol/L; 95% CI: 5.78, 2.59; moderate certainty of evidence)
  • Consumption of the reformulated bread did not lower HOMA-IR compared with the control breads (MD: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.22; moderate certainty of evidence)
  • Consumption of the reformulated bread did not lower HbA1c concentrations compared with the control bread (0.14; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.10; P 1⁄4 0.195; very low certainty of evidence).

Considerations for future research

  • Longer intervention periods may be required to determine the beneficial effects on the HbA1c concentrations and to elicit changes in markers of insulin resistance
  • Future studies should use the 2022 WHO standardised HbA1c diagnostic reference criterion for diabetes mellitus
  • Improvements in specific outcomes may also be linked to defined groups within populations such as persons with manifest T2DM.
  • The type of reformulation of the bread may be an important factor but differ considerably around the world
plain language summary logo
Expert reviews are written by nutrition professionals and academics with advanced qualifications to provide a critical appraisal of the article and implications for practice. Each review is peer-reviewed by a member of the NED Editorial Board. Find out more about our NED Expert Reviewers here.

Abstract

Bread is a major source of grain-derived carbohydrates worldwide. High intakes of refined grains, low in dietary fiber and high in glycemic index, are linked with increased risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and other chronic diseases. Hence, improvements in the composition of bread could influence population health. This systematic review evaluated the effect of regular consumption of reformulated breads on glycemic control among healthy adults, adults at cardiometabolic risk or with manifest T2DM. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies employed a bread intervention (≥2 wk) in adults (healthy, at cardiometabolic risk or manifest T2DM) and reported glycemic outcomes (fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, and postprandial glucose responses). Data were pooled using generic inverse variance with random-effects model and presented as mean difference (MD) or standardized MD between treatments with 95% CIs. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 1037 participants). Compared with "regular" or comparator bread, consumption of reformulated intervention breads yielded lower fasting blood glucose concentrations (MD: -0.21 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.38, -0.03; I = 88%, moderate certainty of evidence), yet no differences in fasting insulin (MD: -1.59 pmol/L; 95% CI: -5.78, 2.59; I = 38%, moderate certainty of evidence), HOMA-IR (MD: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.35, 0.23; I = 60%, moderate certainty of evidence), HbA1c (MD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.39, 0.10; I = 56%, very low certainty of evidence), or postprandial glucose response (SMD: -0.46; 95% CI: -1.28, 0.36; I = 74%, low certainty of evidence). Subgroup analyses revealed a beneficial effect for fasting blood glucose only among people with T2DM (low certainty of evidence). Our findings suggest a beneficial effect of reformulated breads high in dietary fiber, whole grains, and/or functional ingredients on fasting blood glucose concentrations in adults, primarily among those with T2DM. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020205458.

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Address: Institute of Nutrition, Consumption and Health, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany.; Centre for Nutrition, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.; Center of Pediatric Research Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Mohn Nutrition Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.; Centre for Nutrition, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Mohn Nutrition Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.; Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.; Department of Food Biofunctionality (140b), Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany.; Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.; Nutrition and Metabolism, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.; Human Nutrition Research Center, Public Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.; Centre for Nutrition, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Mohn Nutrition Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.