Prioritizing population-based nutrition-related interventions to prevent and control hypertension in Iran: a multi-criteria decision-making approach.

Reza Mahdavi, Soghra Aliasgharzadeh, Leila Nikniaz, Mehrangiz Ebrahimi-Mameghani, Hossein Karimzadeh, Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi, Fathollah Pourali

Journal: BMC medical research methodology 2022;22(1):293

PMID: 36384446

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous nutrition-related policy options and strategies have been proposed to tackle hypertension and other risk factors of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In this study, we developed a comparative analysis using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model for prioritizing population-based nutrition-related interventions to prevent and control hypertension in Iran.

METHODS

We employed a combination of Delphi technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method as the methodological tool to prioritize decision alternatives using multiple criteria. The prominent assessment criteria and intervention strategies were derived using a literature review, focus group discussion (n = 11), and a 2-round modified Delphi technique with specialists and experts involved in different stages of health policy-making (round 1: n = 50, round 2: n = 46). Then, the AHP was used to determine the weightage of the selected interventions and develop the decision-making model. The sensitivity analysis was performed to test the stability of the priority ranking.

RESULTS

Nine alternative interventions were included in the final ranking based on eight assessment criteria. According to the results, the most priority interventions to prevent and control hypertension included reformulation of food products to contain less salt and changing the target levels of salt in foods and meals, providing low-sodium salt substitutes, and reducing salt intake through the implementation of front-of-package labeling (FOPL). The results of the sensitivity analysis and a comparison analysis suggested that the assessment model performed in this study had an appropriate level of robustness in selecting the best option among the proposed alternatives.

CONCLUSION

MCDM techniques offer a potentially valuable approach to rationally structuring the problem, along with the opportunity to make explicit the judgments used as part of the decision-making model. The findings of this study provide a preliminary evidence base to guide future decisions and reforms aiming to improve appropriate population-based interventions for tackling hypertension and other risk factors of NCDs.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Address: Student Research Committee, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.; Social Determinant of Health Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.; Nutrition Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.; Department of rural planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.; Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.; Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. [email protected].; Community Nutrition Department of Public Health Deputy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.