Hepatitis C prevalence in incarcerated settings between 2013-2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dana Busschots, Rob Bielen, Leen Heyens, Frederik Nevens, Geert Robaeys, Cécile Kremer, Niel Hens, Özgür M Koc

Journal: BMC public health 2022;22(1):2159

PMID: 36419013

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of highly effective direct-acting antiviral therapy has changed the hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment paradigm. However, a recent update on HCV epidemiology in incarcerated settings is necessary to accurately determine the extent of the problem, provide information to policymakers and public healthcare, and meet the World Health Organization's goals by 2030. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the prevalence of HCV Ab and RNA in incarcerated settings.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for papers published between January 2013 and August 2021. We included studies with information on the prevalence of HCV Ab or RNA in incarcerated settings. A random-effects meta-analysis was done to calculate the pooled prevalence and meta-regression to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Ninety-two unique sources reporting data for 36 countries were included. The estimated prevalence of HCV Ab ranged from 0.3% to 74.4%. HCV RNA prevalence (available in 46 sources) ranged from 0% to 56.3%. Genotypes (available in 19 sources) 1(a) and 3 were most frequently reported in incarcerated settings. HCV/HIV coinfection (available in 36 sources) was highest in Italy, Estonia, Pakistan, and Spain. Statistical analysis revealed that almost all observed heterogeneity reflects real differences in prevalence between studies, considering I was very high in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV in incarcerated settings is still a significant problem with a higher prevalence than in the general population. It is of utmost importance to start screening for HCV (Ab and RNA) in incarcerated settings to give clear, reliable and recent figures to plan further treatment. This is all in the context of meeting the 2030 WHO targets which are only less than a decade away.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020162616.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Address: Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, Diepenbeek, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium. [email protected].; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium. [email protected].; Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-Biostat), Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, Diepenbeek, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.; Medical Microbiology, School of NUTRIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.; School of NUTRIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals KU, Leuven, Belgium.; Centre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.