Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation.

Bonnie R Brammall, Rhonda M Garad, Jacqueline A Boyle, Melanie J Hayman, Susan J de Jersey, Helena J Teede, Quoc V Hong, Alayna Carrandi, Cheryce L Harrison

Journal: Journal of medical Internet research 2022;24(11):e37552

PMID: 36427237

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and behavior change potential of publicly available digital tools (websites and apps) that facilitate GWG tracking.

METHODS

Digital tools were identified using key search terms across website search engines and app stores and evaluated using the Mobile App Rating Scale, the App Behavior Change Scale, as well as criteria to evaluate the rigor and safety of GWG information.

RESULTS

Overall, 1085 tools were screened for inclusion (162 websites and 923 apps), and 19 were deemed eligible. The mean Mobile App Rating Scale quality score was 3.31 (SD 0.53) out of 5, ranging from 2.26 to 4.39, and the mean App Behavior Change Scale score was 6 (SD 3.4) out of 21, ranging from 19 to 0. Of the 19 items used to evaluate rigor of GWG advice, most tools (n=11, 57.9%) contained ≤3 items.

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasizes the substantial limitations in current digital resources promoting the monitoring and optimization of GWG. Most tools were of low quality, had minimal behavior change potential, and were potentially unsafe, with minimal linkage to evidence-based information or partnership with health care.

©Bonnie R Brammall, Rhonda M Garad, Jacqueline A Boyle, Melanie J Hayman, Susan J de Jersey, Helena J Teede, Quoc V Hong, Alayna Carrandi, Cheryce L Harrison. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 25.11.2022.

Address: Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.; Appleton Institute, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Herston, Australia.; Perinatal Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.; Diabetes and Vascular Research, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.