Dmitry Molodenskiy, Sameer Velankar, Christine Orengo, Torsten Schwede, Augustin Žídek, Andrew Mark Waterhouse, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Silvio Tosatto, Luiggi Tenorio-Ku, Dmitri Svergun, Erzsebet Suhajda, Martin Steinegger, Markus J Sommer, Steven L Salzberg, Edoardo Salladini, Damiano Piovesan, Mihaly Varadi, Agata Laydon, John Jumper, Robbie Joosten, Maarten L Hekkelman, Tamas Hegedus, Andras Hatos, Demis Hassabis, Tim Green, Mandar Deshpande, Clemente Borges, Stefan Bienert, Stephen Anyango, Gerardo Tauriello, Ian Sillitoe, Sreenath Nair
Journal: GigaScience 2022;11():giac118
PMID: 36448847
While scientists can often infer the biological function of proteins from their 3-dimensional quaternary structures, the gap between the number of known protein sequences and their experimentally determined structures keeps increasing. A potential solution to this problem is presented by ever more sophisticated computational protein modeling approaches. While often powerful on their own, most methods have strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, it benefits researchers to examine models from various model providers and perform comparative analysis to identify what models can best address their specific use cases. To make data from a large array of model providers more easily accessible to the broader scientific community, we established 3D-Beacons, a collaborative initiative to create a federated network with unified data access mechanisms. The 3D-Beacons Network allows researchers to collate coordinate files and metadata for experimentally determined and theoretical protein models from state-of-the-art and specialist model providers and also from the Protein Data Bank.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press GigaScience.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.