Comparison of recent ceramide-based coronary risk prediction scores in cardiovascular disease patients.

Andreas Leiherer, Axel Mündlein, Reijo Laaksonen, Mitja Lääperi, Antti Jylhä, Peter Fraunberger, Heinz Drexel

Journal: European journal of preventive cardiology 2022;29(6):947-956

PMID: 34417607

Abstract

AIM

Cholesterol-based risk prediction is often insufficient in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients. Ceramides are a new kind of biomarkers for CVD. The Coronary Event Risk Test (CERT) is a validated cardiovascular risk predictor that uses only circulating ceramide levels, determined by coupled liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, to allocate patients into one of four risk categories. This test has recently been modified (CERT2) by additionally including phosphatidylcholine levels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this observational cohort study, we have recruited 999 Austrian patients with CVD and followed them for up to 13 years. We found that CERT and CERT2 both predicted cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and overall mortality. CERT2 had the higher performance compared to CERT and also to the recent cardiovascular risk score of the ESC/EAS guidelines (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE)) for low-risk European countries. Combining CERT2 with the ESC/EAS-SCORE, predictive capacity was further increased leading to a hazard ratio of 3.58 (2.02-6.36; P < 0.001) for cardiovascular events, 11.60 (2.72-49.56; P = 0.001) for cardiovascular mortality, and 9.86 (4.23-22.99; P < 0.001) for overall mortality when patients with very high risk (category 4) were compared to those with low risk (category 1). The use of the combined score instead of the ESC/EAS-SCORE significantly improved the predictive power according to the integrated discrimination improvement index (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that CERT and CERT2 are powerful predictors of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and overall mortality in CVD patients. Including phosphatidylcholine to a ceramide-based score increases the predictive performance and is best in combination with classical risk factors as used in the ESC/EAS-SCORE.

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: [email protected].

Address: Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (VIVIT), Carinagasse 47, A-6800 Feldkirch, Austria.; Medical Central Laboratories, Carinagasse 41, A-6807, Feldkirch, Austria.; Private University of the Principality of Liechtenstein, Dorfstrasse 24 FL-9495 Triesen, Liechtenstein.; Finnish Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Tampere, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.; Zora Biosciences Oy, Tietotie 2C, 02150 Espoo, Finland.; Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Teaching Hospital Bregenz, Carl-Pedenz-Str. 2, A-6900 Bregenz, Austria.; Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 W Qeen Ln, PA 19129 Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.