Selecting interventions for a psychosocial support program for prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance: A modified Delphi study.

Kim Donachie, Marian Adriaansen, Minke Nieuwboer, Erik Cornel, Esther Bakker, Lilian Lechner

Journal: Psycho-oncology 2022;31(12):2132-2140

PMID: 36245432

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Curative treatment of low-risk prostate cancer (LR-PCa) does not improve cancer specific survival and active surveillance (AS) is recommended. Although AS is cost-effective and reduces treatment-related complications, it requires psychosocial support. Research on psychosocial interventions specifically focused on men undergoing AS is limited. Aim of this study is to reach consensus amongst relevant stakeholders on selecting interventions offering psychosocial support to PCa patients during AS.

METHODS

In accordance with the RAND/UCLA method, a modified Delphi approach was used to establish consensus on selecting interventions. During phase one, interventions were identified through a literature review and open survey among all participants. During phase two, three consensus rounds were conducted to rate potential interventions and obtain statistical consensus. The IQ healthcare consensus tool was used to calculate statistical consensus.

RESULTS

After the first consensus round, 31 participants scored individual interventions on relevance using a 9-point Likert scale resulting in the selection of six interventions. During the second consensus round 13 discussion items were reviewed during a focus group. After the third consensus round, seven additional interventions were selected by 23 participants.

CONCLUSIONS

In total, 13 interventions were selected for inclusion in a support program. This included four interventions within the domain information and education, three within coping and support, one intervention within physical wellbeing and four within the domain lifestyle.

© 2022 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Academy of Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.; Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands.; Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.