Duodenal Switch vs. Single-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S) for the Treatment of Grade IV Obesity: 5-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Comparative Study.

Jordi Pujol Gebellí, Claudio Lazzara, Amador García Ruiz de Gordejuela, Mario Nora, Ana Marta Pereira, Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute, Javier Osorio, Lucia Sobrino, Antonio J Torres García

Journal: Obesity surgery 2022;32(12):3839-3846

PMID: 36282430

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims were to compare the 5-year outcomes of duodenal switch (DS) and single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) in terms of weight loss; remission of comorbidities; nutritional status short- and long-term complications; postoperative mortality; and need for revisional surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multicenter prospective observational study of all consecutive patients undergoing DS or SADI-S in three high-volume hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included in the study, 43 submitted to DS and 44 to SADI-S, with similar basal characteristics, nutritional parameters, and BMI (52.9 kg/m DS vs. 52.5 kg/m SADI-S). Operative time was 152 min (± 32.6) in DS vs. 116 min (± 21.9) in SADI-S (p = 0.043). Short-term complications were similar for DS and SADI-S, both overall (11.8% vs. 11.6%), and ranged as Clavien-Dindo > II (4.5% vs. 4.7%), with no mortality. At 5 years, DS and SADI-S results were as follows: BMI 30.6 vs. 33.3 kg/m (p = 0.023); %EWL 80.5% vs. 68.6% (p = 0.006); and %TWL 42.1 vs. 36.0 (p = 0.006). Comorbidity remission rates for DS and SADI-S were as follows: for diabetes, 92.8% vs. 85.7% (n.s.); for hypertension, 95.2% vs. 85.1% (n.s.); for sleep apnea, 75% vs. 73.3% (n.s.); and for dyslipidemia, 76.4% vs. 73.3% (n.s.). DS showed lower levels of vitamin B, iron, vitamin E, and zinc than SADI-S (p =  < 0.005). In the long term, there were 4 surgical reinterventions (due to 1 internal hernia in the DS group and 1 internal hernia and 2 biliary refluxes in the SADI-S group) with no cases of persistent diarrhea or malnutrition.

CONCLUSION

Both DS and SADI-S allowed good weight control and resolution of comorbidities. DS achieved a greater weight loss compared to SADI-S, at the expense of longer operative time and lower vitamin and mineral levels.

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Address: Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona,, C/Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona,, C/Feixa Llarga S/N, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. [email protected].; Department of Obesity Surgery, Centro Hospital de Entre O Douro E Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.; Department of General Surgery and Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.