Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: recent concepts in diagnosis, mechanisms and management.

Andreas B Gevaert, Rachna Kataria, Faiez Zannad, Andrew J Sauer, Kevin Damman, Kavita Sharma, Sanjiv J Shah, Harriette G C Van Spall

Journal: Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2022;108(17):1342-1350

PMID: 35022210

Abstract

It is estimated that half of all patients with heart failure (HF) have HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Yet this form of HF remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Differentiating HFpEF from other causes of dyspnoea may require advanced diagnostic methods, such as exercise echocardiography, invasive haemodynamics and investigations for 'HFpEF mimickers'. While the classification of HF has relied heavily on cut-points in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), recent evidence points towards a gradual shift in underlying mechanisms, phenotypes and response to therapies as LVEF increases. For example, among patients with HF, the proportion of hospitalisations and deaths due to cardiac causes decreases as LVEF increases. Medication classes that are efficacious in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have been less so at higher LVEF ranges, decreasing the risk of HF hospitalisation but not cardiovascular or all-cause death in HFpEF. These observations reflect the burden of non-cardiac comorbidities as LVEF increases and highlight the complex pathophysiological mechanisms, both cardiac and non-cardiac, underpinning HFpEF. Treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduces the risk of composite cardiovascular events, driven by a reduction in HF hospitalisations; renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers and angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors result in smaller reductions in HF hospitalisations among patients with HFpEF. Comprehensive management of HFpEF includes exercise as well as treatment of risk factors and comorbidities. Classification based on phenotypes may facilitate a more targeted approach to treatment than LVEF categorisation, which sets arbitrary cut-points when LVEF is a continuum. This narrative review summarises the pathophysiology, diagnosis, classification and management of patients with HFpEF.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Address: Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, GENCOR Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.; Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.; Department of Cardiology-Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation, Corrigan Minehan Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Université de Lorraine, INSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-1433 and INSERM U1116, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.; Investigation Network Initiative-Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists, French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Nancy, France.; Center for Advanced Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.; Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada [email protected].; Research Institute of St. Joe's and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.