Farhad Hafezi, Jia Zhang, Nan-Ji Lu, Jos J Rozema, Mark Hillen, Nikki Hafezi, Carina Koppen
Journal: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2022;48(9):1057-1062
PMID: 35171143
PURPOSE
To assess the repeatability of several corneal biomechanical parameters with a Scheimpflug tonometer (Corvis ST) in myopic eyes and eyes that underwent transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK), small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), or femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery.
SETTING
Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
DESIGN
Prospective randomized controlled study.
METHODS
315 eyes from 315 patients (135 myopes, 58 post-transPRK, 52 post-SMILE, and 70 post-FS-LASIK) were included. 3 consecutive scans were performed to evaluate the repeatability of the 40 parameters examined.
RESULTS
315 eyes were included. In all eyes, the coefficient of variation (CoV) for intraocular pressure (IOP) and biomechanical-corrected IOP (bIOP) ranged from 7.29% to 9.47% and 6.11% to 7.75%, respectively; the CoV of pachymetry was <0.8%. The intraclass correlation coefficient of Corvis Biomechanical Index-Laser Vision Correction (LVC) was 0.680 for post-transPRK, 0.978 for post-SMILE, and 0.911 for post-FS-LASIK. The CoV of Stress-Strain Index (SSI) was 204.93% for post-transPRK, 91.92% for post-SMILE, and 171.72% for post-FS-LASIK. The CoV of the 6 clinically important dynamic corneal response parameters ranged from 2.0% to 7.8% for myopia, 1.8% to 11.1% for post-transPRK, 2.1% to 8.7% for post-SMILE, and 1.8% to 8.8% for post-FS-LASIK.
CONCLUSIONS
Excellent intrameasurement repeatability of IOP, bIOP, and pachymetry was observed in all groups; SSI measurement in post-LVC corneas displayed more variation. Caution is warranted when assessing SSI in post-LVC corneas for the purpose of diagnosing iatrogenic ectasia or evaluating biomechanical remodeling of postoperative refractive corneas.
Copyright © 2022 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.