Image quality assessment of retinal fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy in the machine learning era: a review.

Mariana Batista Gonçalves, Luis Filipe Nakayama, Daniel Ferraz, Hanna Faber, Edward Korot, Fernando Korn Malerbi, Caio Vinicius Regatieri, Mauricio Maia, Leo Anthony Celi, Pearse A Keane, Rubens Belfort

Journal: Eye (London, England) 2024;38(3):426-433

PMID: 37667028

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality assessment (IQA) and quality criteria employed in publicly available datasets for diabetic retinopathy (DR). A literature search strategy was used to identify relevant datasets, and 20 datasets were included in the analysis. Out of these, 12 datasets mentioned performing IQA, but only eight specified the quality criteria used. The reported quality criteria varied widely across datasets, and accessing the information was often challenging. The findings highlight the importance of IQA for AI model development while emphasizing the need for clear and accessible reporting of IQA information. The study suggests that automated quality assessments can be a valid alternative to manual labeling and emphasizes the importance of establishing quality standards based on population characteristics, clinical use, and research purposes. In conclusion, image quality assessment is important for AI model development; however, strict data quality standards must not limit data sharing. Given the importance of IQA for developing, validating, and implementing deep learning (DL) algorithms, it's recommended that this information be reported in a clear, specific, and accessible way whenever possible. Automated quality assessments are a valid alternative to the traditional manual labeling process, and quality standards should be determined according to population characteristics, clinical use, and research purpose.

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.

Address: Department of Ophthalmology, Sao Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Instituto Paulista de Estudos e Pesquisas em Oftalmologia, IPEPO, Vision Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfield Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.; Department of Ophthalmology, Sao Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected].; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Cambridge, MA, USA. [email protected].; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.; Retina Specialists of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.; Stanford University Byers Eye Institute Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, USA.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Cambridge, MA, USA.; Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Boston, MA, USA.; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.