Diagnostic efficacy of serum presepsin for postoperative infectious complications: a meta-analysis.

Jheng-Yan Wu, I-Wen Chen, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Chun-Ying Lu, Chia-Li Kao, Hui-Chen Hsu, Chia-Hung Yu, Wei-Ting Chang, Ping-Hsun Feng

Journal: Frontiers in immunology 2023;14():1320683

PMID: 38149257

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative infectious complications (PICs) are major concerns. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical for timely treatment and improved outcomes. Presepsin is an emerging biomarker for bacterial infections. However, its diagnostic efficacy for PICs across surgical specialties remains unclear.

METHODS

In this study, a systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library was performed on September 30, 2023, to identify studies that evaluated presepsin for diagnosing PICs. PIC is defined as the development of surgical site infection or remote infection. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were calculated. The primary outcome was the assessment of the efficacy of presepsin for PIC diagnosis, and the secondary outcome was the investigation of the reliability of procalcitonin or C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnosis of PICs.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included eight studies (n = 984) and revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of presepsin for PIC diagnosis were 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68%-82%) and 83% (95% CI 75%-89%), respectively. The HSROC curve yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.81). Analysis of six studies on procalcitonin showed a combined sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 77%, with an AUC of 0.83 derived from the HSROC. Meanwhile, data from five studies on CRP indicated pooled sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 79%, with the HSROC curve yielding an AUC of 0.89.

CONCLUSION

Presepsin exhibits moderate diagnostic accuracy for PIC across surgical disciplines. Based on the HSROC-derived AUC, CRP has the highest diagnostic efficacy for PICs, followed by procalcitonin and presepsin. Nonetheless, presepsin demonstrated greater specificity than the other biomarkers. Further study is warranted to validate the utility of and optimize the cutoff values for presepsin.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023468358.

Copyright © 2023 Lu, Kao, Hung, Wu, Hsu, Yu, Chang, Feng and Chen.

Address: Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Anesthesiology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.; Department of Nutrition, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Otolaryngology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.; School of Medicine and Doctoral Program of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medicine and Center of Excellence for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Biotechnology, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan.; Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.