Effect of preinitiated glucose-insulin-potassium strategy for patients with undergoing planned percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huiruo Liu, Rugang Liu, Zeyu Yang, Feng Xu, Chuanbao Li

Journal: BMJ open 2023;13(12):e073557

PMID: 38149412

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Whether the glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) should be used as an adjuvant therapy for ischaemic myocardial disease remains controversial nowadays reperfusion era. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of preinitiated GIK for patients undergoing planned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of science, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 27 November 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials involving participants preinitiated with GIK or placebo before planned PCI were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included trials. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. Pooled analysis was conducted using random or effects models according to the heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were carried out for dosage of GIK and if with ongoing myocardial ischaemia.

RESULTS

13 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including 3754 participants were evaluated. We found patients preconditioned with GIK before PCI showed a significant increase in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 flow events after angioplasty (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.46, p=0.04), also revealed improved in-hospital left ventricular ejection fraction (weighed mean difference, WMD 1.62, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.03, p=0.02) and myocardial salvage index (WMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.16, p=0.03). Nevertheless, no benefit was observed in all-cause mortality neither on 30-day (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.11, p=0.18) nor 6 months (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.46, p=0.97). Furthermore, GIK intervention was associated with higher occurrences of complications such as phlebitis (OR 10.13, 95% CI 1.74 to 59.00, p=0.01) and hypoglycaemia (OR 10.43, 95% CI 1.32 to 82.29, p=0.03), but not hyperkalaemia (OR 9.36, 95% CI 0.50 to 175.27, p=0.13), liquid overload (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.25 to 4.13, p=0.98) or in-hospital heart failure (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.96, p=0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows preconditioning GIK exhibits myocardial reperfusion and cardiac function benefits for patients planning to receive PCI intervention, while also some complications such as phlebitis and hypoglycaemia accompany.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022326334.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Address: Department of Emergency Medicine and Chest Pain Centre, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.; Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Chest Pain Centre, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.