A 2-yr Randomized Controlled Trial on Creatine Supplementation during Exercise for Postmenopausal Bone Health.

Philip D Chilibeck, Darren G Candow, Julianne J Gordon, Whitney R D Duff, Riley Mason, Keely Shaw, Regina Taylor-Gjevre, Bindu Nair, Gordon A Zello

Journal: Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2023;55(10):1750-1760

PMID: 37144634

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Osteoporosis is a bone disease that gradually develops when bone mineral density (BMD) or bone mass decreases and the quality of bone is impaired. This randomised controlled trial conducted over 2 years wanted to test the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation on BMD at several bone sites during a supervised resistance training and walking program in post menopausal women. 120 were randomly allocated to creatine and 117 to placebo. All participants received a daily supplement of 500 mg of calcium and 10 μg -400 IU of vitamin D. The researchers were particularly interested in finding out whether the creatine group showed improved (BMD) at the femoral neck, lower spine and upper thigh bone also known as the proximal femur which connects the hip joint. Bone density scans, dual-energy X-ray’s and ultrasounds were used to measure BMD and assess areas of bone. Falls and fractures were recorded for a total of 3 years. Dietary intake and physical activity outside of study requirements was assessed using food frequency and exercise questionnaires. Fasting blood and urine analyses along with 24-h urine analysis were taken. The authors conclude that creatine supplementation during a resistance training and walking program had no effect on BMD at the femoral neck, total hip, or lower spine. They further acknowledge relatively low compliance with the creatine supplements, and exercise protocols, along with a high drop out rate. Further studies of larger sample sizes are needed.

Expert Review

Reviewer: Kirsty Baxter
29th Apr 2024
plain language summary logo

Conflict of interest

None

Take home message

  • Creatine supplementation may have beneficial effects on bone geometry at the proximal femur when combined with a resistance training program and walking programme in postmenopausal women.

Evidence category

A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)

Summary review

Introduction

This study aimed to determine the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation and exercise on femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD and proximal femur geometric properties in postmenopausal women over 2 years.

Methods

  • 237 postmenopausal women (mean age, 59 yr) were randomised into 2 groups across 2 sites.
  • Participant inclusion criteria: no menstrual period for 2 years, and considered at “low” and “moderate” risk of fracture.
  • Treatment group (n=120) received creatine monohydrate (0.14 g/kg−1 per day−1 mixed with 0.14 g·kg−1·d−1 maltodextrin) and supervised resistance training plus partially supervised walking.
  • Placebo group (n=117) received 0.28 g·kg−1·d−1 maltodextrin and supervised resistance training plus partially supervised walking.
  • All participants also received 500 mg of calcium and 10 μg (400 IU) of vitamin D per day.
  • Resistance exercises and 20-30 mins of brisk walking were performed in-lab and supervised 3 days per week. 3 days of non- supervised 20-30 mins of brisk walking was undertaken outside of the lab.

Results

  • Creatine monohydrate supplementation combined with resistance training and walking over 2 yr: i) had no effect on BMD at the femoral neck (P < 0.0001), total hip (P < 0.0001), or lumbar spine (P= 0.003); ii) increased lean tissue mass compared with placebo (P = 0.046); iii) preserved a number of geometric properties and may therefore help to maintain bone bending strength and cortical bending under compressive loads.
  • The authors speculated that creatine supplementation stimulates remodeling of bone to alter geometric properties and whether bone formation or resorption predominates depends on the location of bone in the proximal femur.

Conclusion

  • 2 years of creatine supplementation with resistance training and walking in postmenopausal women had no beneficial effects on BMD but did improve the proximal femur cortical thickness and section modulus bone geometry, and reduced SPW and buckling ratio that may be protective against hip fracture.

Adverse Events: The dose of creatine over 2 years resulted in minimal adverse events. Limitation: Low compliance at 56%, and high attrition within the groups: creatine (n=86 of n=120) and placebo (n=88 of n=117) , 61% compliance for exercise sessions completed.

Clinical practice applications

Creatine supplementation is effective for increasing lean tissue mass when combined with resistance training that may allow for increased mechanical stress on bone, stimulating a net bone formation.

Considerations for future research

  • Assess the mechanism of action of creatine supplementation on BMD.
  • Longer term follow-up with larger sample sizes would be needed to confirm protection against hip fracture with creatine supplementation.
plain language summary logo
Expert reviews are written by nutrition professionals and academics with advanced qualifications to provide a critical appraisal of the article and implications for practice. Each review is peer-reviewed by a member of the NED Editorial Board. Find out more about our NED Expert Reviewers here.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to examine the effects of 2 yr of creatine monohydrate supplementation and exercise on bone health in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-seven postmenopausal women (mean age, 59 yr) were randomized to receive creatine (0.14 g·kg -1 ·d -1 ) or placebo during a resistance training (3 d·wk -1 ) and walking (6 d·wk -1 ) program for 2 yr. Our primary outcome was the femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), with lumbar spine BMD and proximal femur geometric properties as the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, creatine supplementation had no effect on BMD of the femoral neck (creatine: 0.725 ± 0.110 to 0.712 ± 0.100 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.721 ± 0.102 to 0.706 ± 0.097 g·cm -2 ), total hip (creatine: 0.879 ± 0.118 to 0.872 ± 0.114 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.881 ± 0.111 to 0.873 ± 0.109 g·cm -2 ), or lumbar spine (creatine: 0.932 ± 0.133 to 0.925 ± 0.131 g·cm -2 ; placebo: 0.923 ± 0.145 to 0.915 ± 0.143 g·cm -2 ). Creatine significantly maintained section modulus (1.35 ± 0.29 to 1.34 ± 0.26 vs 1.34 ± 0.25 to 1.28 ± 0.23 cm 3 (placebo), P = 0.0011), predictive of bone bending strength, and buckling ratio (10.8 ± 2.6 to 11.1 ± 2.2 vs 11.0 ± 2.6 to 11.6 ± 2.7 (placebo), P = 0.011), predictive of reduced cortical bending under compressive loads, at the narrow part of the femoral neck. Creatine reduced walking time over 80 m (48.6 ± 5.6 to 47.1 ± 5.4 vs 48.3 ± 4.5 to 48.2 ± 4.9 s (placebo), P = 0.0008) but had no effect on muscular strength (i.e., one-repetition maximum) during bench press (32.1 ± 12.7 to 42.6 ± 14.1 vs 30.6 ± 10.9 to 41.4 ± 14 kg (placebo)) and hack squat (57.6 ± 21.6 to 84.4 ± 28.1 vs 56.6 ± 24.0 to 82.7 ± 25.0 kg (placebo)). In the subanalysis of valid completers, creatine increased lean tissue mass compared with placebo (40.8 ± 5.7 to 43.1 ± 5.9 vs 40.4 ± 5.3 to 42.0 ± 5.2 kg (placebo), P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Two years of creatine supplementation and exercise in postmenopausal women had no effect on BMD; yet, it improved some bone geometric properties at the proximal femur.

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Sports Medicine.

Address: College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CANADA.; Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK, CANADA.; College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CANADA.; College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CANADA.

Patient Centred Factor

Laboratory Testing

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Nutrition Evidence Keywords

Bioactive Substances

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.