Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).

S Kuah, B Simpson, A Salter, G Matthews, J Louise, J Bednarz, E Chandraharan, I Symonds, A McPhee, B W Mol, D Turnbull, C Wilkinson

Journal: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023;62(4):462-470

PMID: 37289946

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether use of ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STan) as an adjunct to continuous cardiotocography (CTG) reduces the rate of emergency Cesarean section (EmCS) compared with CTG alone.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled trial of patients with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation at ≥ 36 weeks' gestation, requiring continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labor at a tertiary maternity hospital in Adelaide, Australia, between January 2018 and July 2021. Participants were randomized to undergo CTG + STan or CTG alone. The calculated sample size was 1818 participants. The primary outcome was EmCS. Secondary outcomes included metabolic acidosis, a composite adverse perinatal outcome, and other maternal and neonatal morbidity and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

The present study enrolled 970 women, of whom 967 were included in the primary analysis. EmCS occurred in 107/482 (22.2%) deliveries in the CTG + STan arm and in 107/485 (22.1%) in the CTG arm (adjusted relative risk, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.81-1.27); P = 0.89). There was no difference in the rate of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of STan as an adjunct to continuous CTG did not reduce the EmCS rate. The smaller-than-anticipated sample size meant that this study was underpowered to detect absolute differences of ≤ 5% and, therefore, this negative finding could be due to a Type-2 error. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

© 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Address: Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Women's and Children's Health, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.; School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Women's and Children's Hospital, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.; School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, SAHMRI Women and Kids, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Global Academy of Medical Education and Training Ltd, London, UK.; Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, SAHMRI Women and Kids, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.; Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.; School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.