Clinical Efficacy and Short-Term Prognosis of Butylphthalide and Sodium Chloride Injection Compared to Edaravone in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Stroke.

BACKGROUND

Acute stroke is characterized by rapid progression, high mortality, and disability rates, making it a significant focus in clinical research. Brain-protective agents, such as butylphthalide and edaravone, have emerged as important therapeutic options for acute stroke.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore how butylphthalide and edaravone promote healing in acute stroke, drawing on relevant data, literature, clinical experience, and personal concepts.

DESIGN

The study design involves a narrative review, which comprehensively explores the pathogenesis of stroke by referencing relevant data and literature. Clinical experience and personal insights were incorporated to provide a holistic understanding. The primary focus was analyzing the mechanisms through which butylphthalide and edaravone facilitate healing in stroke patients.

RESULTS

The review revealed that butylphthalide exhibited multiple beneficial effects, including the protection of mitochondria, reduction of the inflammatory response, enhancement of microcirculation, decrease in blood-brain barrier permeability, and improving nerve cell function. On the other hand, edaravone demonstrated its efficacy by reducing oxidative stress response, inhibiting inflammatory response, and regulating the metabolism of arachidonic acid and apoptosis. These findings highlight the distinct mechanisms through which butylphthalide and edaravone contribute to the healing process in patients with stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the positive impact of butylphthalide and edaravone on the therapeutic effect and short-term prognosis in acute stroke patients. The findings provide valuable guidance for future research and enhance our understanding of these drugs' mechanisms, offering the potential for improved stroke management and patient outcomes.