Co-design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions.

Christina H Smith, Kanthee Anantapong, Andrea Bruun, Anne Walford, Jill Manthorpe, Elizabeth L Sampson, Nathan Davies

Journal: Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 2023;26(2):613-629

PMID: 36647692

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Using co-design processes, we aimed to develop an evidence-based decision guide for family carers and hospital professionals to support decision-making about eating and drinking for hospital patients with severe dementia.

METHODS

Following a systematic review, we interviewed people with mild dementia, family carers and hospital professionals in England. We then held co-design workshops with family carers and hospital professionals. In parallel with the workshops, we used a matrix to synthesize data from all studies and to develop a decision guide prototype. The prototype was iteratively refined through further co-design workshops and discussions among researchers and Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) representatives. We conducted user testing for final feedback and to finalize the decision guide.

RESULTS

Most participants acknowledged the limited benefits of tube feeding and would not use or want it for someone with severe dementia. However, they found decision-making processes and communication about nutrition and hydration were emotionally demanding and poorly supported in acute hospitals. The co-design groups developed the aims of the decision guide to support conversations and shared decision-making processes in acute hospitals, and help people reach evidence-based decisions. It was designed to clarify decision-making stages, provide information and elicit the values/preferences of everyone involved. It encouraged person-centred care, best-interests decision-making and multidisciplinary team working. From user testing, family carers and hospital professionals thought the decision guide could help initiate conversations and inform decisions. The final decision guide was disseminated and is being used in clinical practice in England.

CONCLUSION

We used rigorous and transparent processes to co-design the decision guide with everyone involved. The decision guide may facilitate conversations about nutrition and hydration and help people reach shared decisions that meet the needs and preferences of people with severe dementia. Future evaluation is required to test its real-world impacts.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

People with mild dementia, family carers and hospital professionals contributed to the design of the decision guide through the interviews and co-design workshops. PPI members helped design study procedures and materials and prepare this manuscript.

© 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.; Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, UK.; Family Carer, Patient and Public Involvement Panel, London, UK.; Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.; NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health & Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK.; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London, London, UK.; Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal London Hospital, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.; Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, University College London, London, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.