Comparison of nimodipine formulations and administration techniques via enteral feeding tubes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Abdalla A Ammar, Joseph R Blunck, Justin Shewmaker, Sarah V Burgess, Kristin Kaupp, Caitlin S Brown, Sarah L Clark, Erin D Wieruszewski, Eljim P Tesoro, Jessica Traeger, Mahmoud A Ammar, Mandy J Binning, Stanislav Naydin, Neal Fox, David M Peters, Leana N Mahmoud, Shaun P Keegan, Gretchen M Brophy, Jocelyn Owusu-Guha, Fatma R Hefny, Nicholas G Panos, Laura Delucilla, Zinquon Ngan, Marc M Perreault, Leslie A Hamilton, A Shaun Rowe, Pamela L Buschur, Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud, Sulaiman Almohaish, Melissa Sandler, Michael J Armahizer, Megan E Barra, Aaron M Cook, Colleen A Barthol, Trager D Hintze, Anna Cantin

Journal: Pharmacotherapy 2023;43(4):279-290

PMID: 36880540

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nimodipine improves outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and current guidelines suggest that patients with aSAH receive nimodipine for 21 days. Patients with no difficulty swallowing will swallow the whole capsules or tablets; otherwise, nimodipine liquid must be drawn from capsules, tablets need to be crushed, or the commercially available liquid product be used to facilitate administration through an enteral feeding tube (FT). It is not clear whether these techniques are equivalent. The goal of the study was to determine if different nimodipine formulations and administration techniques were associated with the safety and effectiveness of nimodipine in aSAH.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study conducted in 21 hospitals across North America. Patients admitted with aSAH and received nimodipine by FT for ≥3 days were included. Patient demographics, disease severity, nimodipine administration, and study outcomes were collected. Safety end points included the prevalence of diarrhea and nimodipine dose reduction or discontinuation secondary to blood pressure reduction. Predictors of the study outcomes were analyzed using regression modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 727 patients were included. Administration of nimodipine liquid product was independently associated with higher prevalence of diarrhea compared to other administration techniques/formulations (Odds ratio [OR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-3.67, p-value = 0.001, OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.37-5.55, p-value = 0.005, for old and new commercially available formulations, respectively). Bedside withdrawal of liquid from nimodipine capsules prior to administration was significantly associated with higher prevalence of nimodipine dose reduction or discontinuation secondary to hypotension (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.57-5.06, p-value = 0.001). Tablet crushing and bedside withdrawal of liquid from capsules prior to administration were associated with increased odds of delayed cerebral ischemia (OR 6.66, 95% CI 3.48-12.74, p-value <0.0001 and OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.05-7.52, p-value <0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that enteral nimodipine formulations and administration techniques might not be equivalent. This could be attributed to excipient differences, inconsistency and inaccuracy in medication administration, and altered nimodipine bioavailability. Further studies are needed.

© 2023 The Authors. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Address: Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.; Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.; Department of Pharmacy, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.; University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Pharmacy, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.; OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Pharmacy, Richmond, Virginia, USA.; College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.; Pharmacy Services, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; UKHealthCare, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.; Department of Pharmacotherapy & Pharmacy Services, University Health, San Antonio, Texas, USA.; Department of Pharmacy Practice, Texas A&M College of Pharmacy, College Station, Texas, USA.; Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.; Department of Pharmacy, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.; Department of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.; Global Neurosciences Institute, Pennington, New Jersey, USA.; Premier Health Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, USA.; Cedarville University School of Pharmacy, Cedarville, Ohio, USA.; Department of Pharmacy, Rhode Island Hospital/Lifespan, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.; Department of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.