Prehabilitative versus rehabilitative exercise in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostatectomy.

Favil Singh, Robert U Newton, Dennis R Taaffe, Pedro Lopez, Jeff Thavaseelan, Matthew Brown, Elayne Ooi, Kazunori Nosaka, Dickon Hayne, Daniel A Galvão

Journal: Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2023;149(18):16563-16573

PMID: 37712960

Abstract

PURPOSE

The study compared the efficacy of commencing supervised exercise in men with prostate cancer before and after prostatectomy on objective and patient-reported outcomes, hospital length of stay, and urinary incontinence.

METHODS

Forty-one men were randomised to a 6-week prehabilitation or rehabilitation exercise programme. Prehabilitation involved resistance and aerobic exercise thrice weekly pre-surgery, while rehabilitation comprised the same commencing 6-weeks post-surgery. Assessments included strength, function (chair rise, stair climb, 400-m, 6-m usual, fast, and backwards walk), body composition, fatigue and quality of life, undertaken at pre-surgery, early post-surgery and late post-surgery phase, with urinary incontinence (24-h pad test) assessed at 2, 6, and 12-weeks post-surgery. Intention-to-treat and sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

Of thirty-eight men (48-73 years), 29 completed all assessments with most undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (92.1%). In the pre-surgery phase, prehabilitation improved muscle strength (leg press: 17.2 kg; chest press: 2.9 kg; p ≤ 0.001), 400-m, chair rise, 6-m fast and backward walk tests (p ≤ 0.001-0.028). Strength and function declines in the early post-surgery phase were maintained late post-surgery. Rehabilitation showed declines of these outcomes after surgery with improvement late post-surgery (leg press: 14.6 kg, p < 0.001; chest press: 6.8 kg, p < 0.001; 400-m walk: -12.0 s, p = 0.005), resulting in no difference between groups at 12 weeks. There were no significant differences between groups for patient-reported outcomes, hospital length of stay or urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Pre-surgical exercise enhanced strength and function, protecting against post-surgery declines. Although exercise post-surgery is beneficial for recouping strength and function, where possible men undergoing prostatectomy are encouraged to exercise pre-surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12617001115325 registered 31 July 2017.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia. [email protected].; Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia. [email protected].; School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.; Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.; School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.; Pleural Medicine Unit, Institute for Respiratory Health, Perth, WA, Australia.; Perth Urology Clinic, Perth, WA, Australia.; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia.; UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.; Swan Urology, Perth, WA, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.