Recent Advances in Neuropsychological Test Interpretation for Clinical Practice.

Andrew M Kiselica, Justin E Karr, Cynthia M Mikula, Rylea M Ranum, Jared F Benge, Luis D Medina, Steven Paul Woods

Journal: Neuropsychology review 2024;34(2):637-667

PMID: 37594687

Abstract

Much attention in the field of clinical neuropsychology has focused on adapting to the modern healthcare environment by advancing telehealth and promoting technological innovation in assessment. Perhaps as important (but less discussed) are advances in the development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data. These techniques can yield improvement in diagnostic decision-making and treatment planning with little additional cost. Brooks and colleagues (Can Psychol 50: 196-209, 2009) eloquently summarized best practices in normative data creation and interpretation, providing a practical overview of norm development, measurement error, the base rates of low scores, and methods for assessing change. Since the publication of this seminal work, there have been several important advances in research on development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data, which may be less familiar to the practicing clinician. Specifically, we provide a review of the literature on regression-based normed scores, item response theory, multivariate base rates, summary/factor scores, cognitive intraindividual variability, and measuring change over time. For each topic, we include (1) an overview of the method, (2) a rapid review of the recent literature, (3) a relevant case example, and (4) a discussion of limitations and controversies. Our goal was to provide a primer for use of normative neuropsychological test data in neuropsychological practice.

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Address: Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, 115 Business Loop 70 W, Columbia, MO, 65203, USA. [email protected].; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.; Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.; Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, 115 Business Loop 70 W, Columbia, MO, 65203, USA.; Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Austin, TX, Austin, USA.; Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.