Pharmacokinetic and Exposure Response Analysis of the Double-Blind Randomized Study of Posaconazole and Voriconazole for Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis.

Johan A Maertens, Galia Rahav, Dong-Gun Lee, Shariq Haider, Isabel Cristina Ramirez-Sanchez, Nikolai Klimko, Alfredo Ponce-de-León, Seongah Han, Rebecca Wrishko, Gregory A Winchell, Anjana Grandhi, Hetty Waskin

Journal: Clinical drug investigation 2023;43(9):681-690

PMID: 37676612

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A double-blind phase 3 study was conducted to compare posaconazole 300 mg intravenously (IV)/300 mg orally once daily (twice daily day 1) with voriconazole 4 mg/kg IV twice daily/200 mg orally twice daily (6 mg/kg day 1) for treatment of invasive aspergillosis. This analysis was conducted to summarize the pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of posaconazole and voriconazole using plasma trough concentration (C) as a surrogate for exposure from the double-blind phase 3 study.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic evaluable population included all intention-to-treat (ITT) participants with at least one plasma concentration during the treatment period. Treatment blinding was maintained without therapeutic drug monitoring. C sampling occurred throughout treatment; efficacy and safety were evaluated using quartiles determined by mean C concentrations. Exposure efficacy variables included day 42 all-cause mortality (primary study endpoint) and global clinical response. Exposure safety variables included all adverse events and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic analysis population included 506 of 575 ITT participants (437 with C concentrations: 228 posaconazole, 209 voriconazole). No trend was seen across quartiles of posaconazole C for the key efficacy endpoint of all-cause mortality through day 42. Participants in the highest quartile of voriconazole C had higher all-cause mortality through day 42 than participants in the lower three quartiles of voriconazole C. Similar findings were observed for global clinical response and C. No clear exposure safety trend by quartile was seen for posaconazole or voriconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong exposure-response relationship was not observed across the range of exposure from the administered doses and formulations for posaconazole or voriconazole.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01782131; registered January 30, 2013.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Campus, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. [email protected].; Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. [email protected].; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.; Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.; Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.; North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.; Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.; Certara USA, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.