Bharti Gupta, Pankhuri Misra, Avaranjika Karuppusamy, Dharshna Balamurugan, Maneet Parewa, Maneela Tomar, Shruti Rai, Himani Vashishth, Satarupa Sadhukhan, Navin Kumar Singh, Munmun Koley, Subhranil Saha
Journal: Homeopathy : the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy 2023;112(3):170-183
PMID: 36513330
INTRODUCTION
Epilepsy, one of the most common neurological diseases, contributes to 0.5% of the total disease burden. The burden is highest in sub-Saharan Africa, central Asia, central and Andean Latin America, and south-east Asia. Asian countries report an overall prevalence of 6/1,000 and that in India of 5.59/1,000. We examined whether individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) can produce a significantly different effect from placebos in treatment of pediatric epilepsy in the context of ongoing standard care (SC) using anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs).
METHODS
The study was a 6-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial ( = 60) conducted at the pediatric outpatient department of a homeopathic hospital in West Bengal, India. Patients were randomized to receive either IHMs plus SC ( = 30) or identical-looking placebos plus SC ( = 30). The primary outcome measure was the Hague Seizure Severity Scale (HASS); secondary outcomes were the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE-16) and the Pediatric Quality of Life inventory (PedsQL) questionnaires; all were measured at baseline and after the 3 and 6 month of intervention. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed to detect group differences and effect sizes.
RESULTS
Recruitment and retention rates were 65.2% and 91.7% respectively. Although improvements were greater in the IHMs group than with placebos, with small to medium effect sizes, the inter-group differences were statistically non-significant - for HASS ( = 0.000, = 1.000, two-way repeated measures analysis of variance), QOLCE-16 ( = 1.428, = 0.237), PedsQL (2-4 years) ( = 0.685, = 0.432) and PedsQL (5-18 years) ( = 0.000, = 0.995). , , and were the most frequently prescribed medicines. No serious adverse events were reported from either of the two groups.
CONCLUSION
Improvements in the outcome measures were statistically non-significantly greater in the IHMs group than in the placebos group, with small effect sizes. A different trial design and prescribing approach might work better in future trials.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
CTRI/2018/10/016027.
Faculty of Homeopathy. This article is published by Thieme.
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.