Does adding exercise or physical activity to pharmacological osteoporosis therapy in patients with increased fracture risk improve bone mineral density and lower fracture risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann-Kathrin Schumm, Emma A Craige, Nitin Kumar Arora, Patrick J Owen, Niamh L Mundell, Bjoern Buehring, Uwe Maus, Daniel L Belavy

Journal: Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2023;34(11):1867-1880

PMID: 37430002

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Osteoporosis, a progressive systematic skeletal disease is caused by diminished bone density and strength, which may increase the risk of fragility fractures in the spine, pelvis, femur etc. Women are at greater risk of developing osteoporosis. Osteopenia is an intermediary stage of reduced bone mineral density before progressing into the osteoporosis disease state. Exercise and pharmacological therapies are considered two effective strategies commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Exercise may help to improve bone mineral density, strength and muscle mass and reduce the risk of fractures. This systematic review and meta-analysis of five parallel-arm randomised controlled trials investigated the combined effect of exercise and pharmacological therapy on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, fractures and fracture healing in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a non-significant improvement in bone mineral density in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis followed by combined pharmacological treatment with exercise. Pharmacological therapy alone showed improvement and maintenance of bone mineral density. There was no evidence for the improvement in fragility fracture healing. Due to the low evidence and high heterogeneity of included studies, further robust studies are required to evaluate the combined effect of exercise and pharmacological therapy in people with systematic skeletal disease. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand the benefits of pharmacological therapy in improving osteoporosis and osteopenia and the potential of adding exercise as a therapeutic strategy in clinical practice.

Expert Review

Reviewer: Ana-Paula Agrela
10th Jun 2024
plain language summary logo

Conflict of interest

None

Take home message

  • It is estimated that 30% of women and 20% of men over the age of 50 years worldwide will experience osteopenic fractures during their lifetime.
  • While the evidence certainty is low, the mean effect sizes typically favoured additional exercise to pharmacological treatments for osteopenia and osteoporosis.
  • This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest favourable changes in BMD and BTM after 12 months in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Evidence category

A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)

Summary review

Introduction

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate whether exercise (EX) plus pharmacological therapy (PT) had an additive effect over PT alone on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTM), fracture healing, and fractures in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Method

Five randomised controlled trials (RCT) were included in the review of 530 male and female participants with a mean age of 46 to 81 years. The participant groups consisted of chronic spinal cord injuries with low bone mass, postmenopausal osteoporotic women, postmenopausal breast cancer survivors, women with osteoporosis or osteopenia, and patients with type 2 diabetic osteoporosis.

Results

The meta-analysis reported the following when evaluating the effect of EX + PT compared to PT alone:

  • Hip aBMD increased at 12 months (SMD [95%CI]: 0.18 [− 1.71; 2.06]; (p=0.72); and at the end of the intervention (0.55 [− 7.08; 8.18]; (p = 0.53); I2 = 79%.
  • Femoral neck aBMD decreased at 12 months (− 0.03 [− 1.80; 1.75]; (p = 0.95;) and increased at the end of the intervention (0.13; [− 7.34; 7.60]; (p = 0.86) ); I2 = 80%.
  • Tibia BMD increased at 12 months (0.25 [− 4.85; 5.34]; (p = 0.65); I2 = 57%.
  • Lumbar spine aBMD increased at 12 months (0.20 [− 1.15; 1.55]; (p = 0.67) and at the end of the intervention (0.85 [− 5.02; 6.73]; (p = 0.32); I2 = 90%.
  • No significant results were found for the healing of fractures.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis found changes in BMD and BTM that favoured exercise in addition to pharmacological therapy in osteopenia and osteoporosis patients.

Clinical practice applications

  • Clinical practice guidelines worldwide recommend exercise in combination with pharmacological therapy as part of the treatment for osteopenia and osteoporosis.
  • Although the certainty of the evidence is low, and the heterogeneity is high, it seems logical to prescribe both exercise and pharmacological therapy to patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Considerations for future research

  • This review included five RCTs, therefore more high-quality targeted RCTs are required to examine the additive effect of exercise with pharmacological therapy.
  • Additionally, primary RCTs are needed to evaluate the frequency and duration of different forms of exercise and physical activity to the added effect of pharmacological therapy.
  • Besides exercise and pharmacological therapies, BTM also depends on various other factors such as nutrition and genetic predisposition. These factors also require further investigation in the future.
plain language summary logo
Expert reviews are written by nutrition professionals and academics with advanced qualifications to provide a critical appraisal of the article and implications for practice. Each review is peer-reviewed by a member of the NED Editorial Board. Find out more about our NED Expert Reviewers here.

Abstract

This prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis examines whether exercise (EX) training has an additive effect to osteoanabolic and/or antiresorptive pharmacological therapy (PT) in people with osteoporosis on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), fracture healing, and fractures. Four databases (inception to 6 May 2022), 5 trial registries, and reference lists were searched. Included were randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of EX + PT vs. PT with regard to BMD, BTM, fracture healing, and fractures. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach. Random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was used to estimate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Out of 2593 records, five RCTs with 530 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed with very low certainty evidence and wide confidence intervals that EX + PT compared to PT had larger effect sizes for BMD at 12 months at the hip (SMD [95%CI]: 0.18 [- 1.71; 2.06], n = 3 studies), tibia (0.25 [- 4.85; 5.34], n = 2), lumbar spine (0.20 [- 1.15; 1.55], n = 4), and forearm (0.05 [- 0.35; 0.46], n = 3), but not femoral neck (- 0.03 [- 1.80; 1.75], n = 3). Furthermore, no improvement was revealed for BTM such as bone ALP (- 0.68 [- 5.88; 4.53], n = 3), PINP (- 0.74 [- 10.42; 8.93], n = 2), and CTX-I (- 0.69 [- 9.61; 8.23], n = 2), but with very wide confidence intervals. Three potentially relevant ongoing trials were identified via registries. No data were found for fracture healing or fracture outcomes. It remains unclear whether EX has an additive impact to PT in people with osteoporosis. High-quality, adequately powered, targetted RCTs are required. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022336132.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule Für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801, Bochum, Germany. [email protected].; Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Adelaide, SA, 5034, Australia.; Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule Für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801, Bochum, Germany.; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.; Ruhr Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.; Krankenhaus St. Josef, Bergstraße 6-12, 42105, Wuppertal, Germany.; Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.; Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule Für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801, Bochum, Germany. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.