Impact of sex on the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subgroup analysis of the PanaMa-study (AIO-KRK-0212).

E Goekkurt, D P Modest, T Trarbach, S Stintzing, V Heinemann, G Sommerhäuser, A Stahler, A Kurreck, A H S Alig, S Haas, S Held, A Kretzschmar, K Caca, L Fischer von Weikersthal, A O König, L Mueller, U Graeven, S Fruehauf, M Karthaus, K Heinrich

Journal: ESMO open 2023;8(4):101568

PMID: 37441876

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are usually conducted irrespective of sex. Sex-associated differences relating to safety and efficacy in the treatment of mCRC, however, are gaining interest.

METHODS

PanaMa investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) versus FU/FA alone after induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. In this post hoc analysis, the study population was stratified for sex. Evaluated efficacy endpoints during maintenance treatment were progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint of the trial), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate during maintenance therapy. Safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events during maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 165 male and 83 female patients were randomized and treated. Male and female patients showed numerically better objective response rates with Pmab, without reaching statistical significance. Male patients derived a significant benefit from the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment with regard to PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.88; P = 0.006] that was not observed in female patients (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53-1.35; P = 0.491). The better PFS for male patients treated with Pmab did not translate into improved OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.55-1.30; P = 0.452). Female patients showed numerically improved OS when treated with Pmab. There was no difference in the total of grade ≥3 adverse events during maintenance regarding sex (P = 0.791). Female patients, however, had a higher rate of any grade nausea, diarrhea and stomatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the PanaMa trial, the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC with FU/FA improved the outcome in terms of the primary endpoint (PFS) particularly in male patients. Female patients did not show the same benefit while experiencing higher rates of adverse events. Our results support the development of sex-specific protocols.

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/heinrich_kat.; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Munich Hospital Neuperlach, Munich.; Dr Hancken Hospital, Stade.; Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Moenchengladbach.; Oncology Practice UnterEms, Leer.; Department of Gastroenterology, University Medicine Göttingen, Goettingen.; Gesundheitszentrum St Marien, Amberg.; Department of Gastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg.; MVZ Mitte, Leipzig.; Practice of Hematology and Oncology (HOPE), Hamburg; University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg.; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Friedrich-Ebert-Hospital, Neumünster.; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin.; ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen.; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital (LMU), Munich.; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg.; Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn; Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.