Morteza Izadi, Mahdi Bagheri, Ali Bahrami Far, Antoni Sureda, Mohammad Sadegh Bagheri-Baghdasht, Golshan Ghasemzadeh, Mostafa Soodmand
Journal: American journal of infection control 2023;51(7):779-785
PMID: 36375708
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to compare the 2 mouthwash solutions, including chlorhexidine (CHG) and ozonated water (OZW) to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients on mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS
This randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed in ICU units of hospitals. Patients (n=73) were selected and divided into 2 groups of CHG (n=37) and OZW mouthwash (n=36). Mouthwash was performed by trained nurses. Chi-square test, independent t-test, paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Repeated Measure ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of CHG and OZW mouthwash on the risk of VAP occurrence by Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) checklists and swab culture.
RESULTS
Both CHG and OZW mouthwash reduced the risk of VAP differ at different time points (the first, the third and the fifth days). There was also difference in the incidence of VAP in terms of culture of pulmonary secretions in the 2 groups. Incidence of VAP in the CHG mouthwash group was 45.9%, and also 25% in the OZW mouthwash group. Most pathogens, that found in the culture of pulmonary secretions in the CHG mouthwash was Acinetobacter baumannii; also, in the OZW mouthwash, A baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequent ones.
CONCLUSIONS
OZW mouthwash was more effective than CHG mouthwash to reduce the risk of VAP.
Copyright © 2022 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.