Autobiographical memory specificity and restrained eating: examining the influence of priming with images of healthy and unhealthy foods.

Deborah J Wallis, Jessica Moss, Bethany Varnam, Barbara Dritschel, Nathan Ridout

Journal: Eating and weight disorders : EWD 2023;28(1):53

PMID: 37341829

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dietary restraint has been linked to deficits in the ability to recall detailed memories of personally experienced events (referred to as autobiographical memory specificity). As priming with healthy foods increases the salience of restraint it would be expected to lead to greater deficits in memory specificity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if priming word cues with images of healthy or unhealthy foods would influence the specificity of memory retrieval, and if deficits in memory specificity would be more evident in those reporting higher levels of dietary restraint, or currently dieting.

METHODS

Sixty female undergraduates self-reported if they were currently dieting and completed measures of mood, restraint, and disinhibition, and a modified version of the autobiographical memory task. Participants were presented with positive and negative words (unrelated to eating concerns) and asked to retrieve a specific memory in response to each cue. A food image was shown prior to each word cue; half of the participants were primed with images of healthy foods and half with images of unhealthy foods.

RESULTS

As expected, participants primed with healthy foods retrieved fewer specific memories than did those primed with unhealthy foods. However, neither restraint nor current dieting behaviour was associated with memory specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in memory specificity between the priming conditions cannot be explained in terms of increased salience of restraint. However, it is plausible that unhealthy images led to an increase in positive affect, which in turn improved memory specificity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I: Evidence obtained from: at least one properly designed experimental study.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.; School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B4 7BD, UK.; School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9BU, UK.; School of Psychology, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.