Quantitative comparison of the efficacy of clinical drug treatments for primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Zichao Sui, Haoxiang Zhu, Jieren Luo, Jiesen Yu, Lujin Li, Qingshan Zheng

Journal: Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 2023;113():45-53

PMID: 37178621

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study proposes a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of the efficacy of drugs and placebo in clinical trials for primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases and the clinical studies reporting drug efficacy in the treatment of PPMS were included in the analyses. The cumulative proportion of patients without confirmed disability progression (wCDP%) was used as the main efficacy endpoint. The model-based meta-analysis method was used to describe the time course of each drug (as well as placebo) in order to rank the drug efficacy for the treatment of PPMS.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 3779 patients were included, of which, nine were placebo-controlled and six were single-arm trials. Twelve drugs were included in the study. The results showed that, except for biotin, interferon β-1a, and interferon β-1b, whose efficacy was comparable to the placebo, the efficacy of the other 9 drugs were significantly better than placebo. Among these, ocrelizumab showed outstanding performance, with wCDP% of 72.6 at 96 weeks, while the proportions of rest of the drugs ranged between approximately 55-70%.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide the necessary quantitative information for both the rational clinical use of drugs and future clinical trials in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Address: Center for Drug of Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.; Center for Drug of Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; Center for Drug of Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.