Employees' Baseline Food Choices and the Effect of a Workplace Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating: Secondary Analysis of the ChooseWell 365 Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anne N Thorndike, Eric B Rimm, Maggie R Salinger, Douglas E Levy, Jessica L McCurley, Emily D Gelsomin

Journal: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2023;123(11):1586-1595.e4

PMID: 37257691

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about whether the effectiveness of workplace wellness programs differs by employees' baseline health behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the association of baseline cafeteria food choices with the effect of a workplace intervention on cafeteria food choices, dietary quality, and body mass index (BMI).

DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of the ChooseWell 365 randomized controlled trial, testing a set of behavioral interventions to improve diet and prevent weight gain.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Participants were 602 employees of a Boston, MA, hospital who had purchased food from cafeterias, which used traffic-light food labeling. Data were collected in 2016-2020.

INTERVENTION

The 12-month intervention (plus 12 months' follow-up) involved financial incentives and personalized feedback on cafeteria purchases. The control group received monthly letters with generic healthy eating and exercise tips.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Healthy purchasing scores (HPS) were calculated by weighting color categories (red = 0, yellow = 0.5, green = 1) and scaling from 0 to 100 (healthiest); employees were categorized into baseline (pre-intervention) HPS tertiles (T1 = least healthy, T3 = healthiest). Healthy eating index (HEI-2015) scores were calculated from two 24-hour dietary recalls. Intervention effects on 12- and 24-month changes in HPS (primary outcome), HEI-2015 score, and BMI were compared among tertiles. Subgroup analyses examined whether changes by tertile varied with financial rewards received.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Adjusting for baseline characteristics, multivariable linear regression assessed intervention effects across baseline HPS tertiles.

RESULTS

Compared with T3, T1 employees had lower education; higher obesity, hypertension, and pre-diabetes; and lower HEI-2015 scores. The intervention increased HPS, but no change was observed in HEI-2015 scores or BMI; the intervention effect did not differ among tertiles at 12 or 24 months. Financial incentives were associated with a larger effect on 12-month HPS changes for T1 than for T2/T3 (P-interaction < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with employees with healthier baseline food choices, employees with the least healthy food choices and highest cardiometabolic risk had similar improvements in the nutritional quality of cafeteria purchases as a result of the behavioral intervention, and they appeared to be more responsive to financial incentives.

Copyright © 2023 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.