Bio-impedance spectroscopy added to a fluid management protocol does not improve preservation of residual kidney function in incident hemodialysis patients in a randomized controlled trial.

Indranil Dasgupta, Julius Sim, Ivonne Solis-Trapala, Lazaros Andronis, Mandana Zanganeh, Jamie MacDonald, Paula Ormandy, Sandip Mitra, Andrew Davenport, David Coyle, Fergus J Caskey, John Belcher, David Keane, Elizabeth J Lindley, Simon J Davies, Ken Farrington, Martin Wilkie

Journal: Kidney international 2023;104(3):587-598

PMID: 37263353

Abstract

Avoiding excessive dialysis-associated volume depletion may help preserve residual kidney function (RKF). To establish whether knowledge of the estimated normally hydrated weight from bioimpedance measurements (BI-NHW) when setting the post-hemodialysis target weight (TW) might mitigate rate of loss of RKF, we undertook an open label, randomized controlled trial in incident patients receiving HD, with clinicians and patients blinded to bioimpedance readings in controls. A total of 439 patients with over 500 ml urine/day or residual GFR exceeding 3 ml/min/1.73m were recruited from 34 United Kingdom centers and randomized 1:1, stratified by center. Fluid assessments were made for up to 24 months using a standardized proforma in both groups, supplemented by availability of BI-NHW in the intervention group. Primary outcome was time to anuria, analyzed using competing-risk survival models adjusted for baseline characteristics, by intention to treat. Secondary outcomes included rate of RKF decline (mean urea and creatinine clearance), blood pressure and patient-reported outcomes. There were no group differences in cause-specific hazard rates of anuria (0.751; 95% confidence interval (0.459, 1.229)) or sub-distribution hazard rates (0.742 (0.453, 1.215)). RKF decline was markedly slower than anticipated, pooled linear rates in year 1: -0.178 (-0.196, -0.159)), year 2: -0.061 (-0.086, -0.036)) ml/min/1.73m/month. Blood pressure and patient-reported outcomes did not differ by group. The mean difference agreement between TW and BI-NHW was similar for both groups, Bioimpedance: -0.04 kg; Control: -0.25 kg. Thus, use of a standardized clinical protocol for fluid assessment when setting TW is associated with excellent preservation of RKF. Hence, bioimpedance measurements are not necessary to achieve this.

Copyright © 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; NIHR Devices for Dignity, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.; Renal Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.; CÚRAM SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.; Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.; Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.; UCL Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, University College, London, UK.; Renal Medicine, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hertfordshire, UK.; Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University Hospital Manchester, Manchester, UK.; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.; Renal Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.; Institute of Applied Human Physiology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.; Centre for Health Economics at Warwick, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.