Non-pharmacological interventions for community-dwelling older adults with possible sarcopenia or sarcopenia: a scoping review.

Ya Shi, Yimin Tang, Emma Stanmore, Lisa McGarrigle, Chris Todd

Journal: Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2023;112():105022

PMID: 37084601

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a progressive, age-related muscle disease that, if left untreated, imposes significant personal, social, and economic burdens.

OBJECTIVE

To compile and document the nature and extent of existing studies exploring non-pharmacological interventions as a strategy to prevent or treat possible sarcopenia or sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.

METHOD

Thirteen databases were searched up from January 2010 to March 2023 and filters were limited to English and Chinese language. Studies with older adults (≥60 y) in the community were included. The review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR guidance and seven stages of methodology framework. A descriptive synthesis of trial characteristics and effectiveness was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 59 studies were included in the analysis. Most studies were RCTs. Few studies enrolled older adults with possible sarcopenia. The 70-79 age group has been studied more than any other age group. Six intervention types were identified, including exercise-only, nutrition-only, health education-only, traditional Chinese medicine-only, multicomponent intervention and control type. Majority of exercise-only interventions received resistance-based exercise. In nutrition-only category, overall food intervention or nutrients intervention was more than dietary pattern. Moreover, exercise plus nutrition was the main sub-type in multicomponent interventions. Health education-only and traditional Chinese medicine-only interventions were less frequently identified. Most studies had high and moderate compliance.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence for the effectiveness of exercise and exercise plus nutrition interventions in improving muscle strength and physical performance, whereas the effectiveness of other intervention types or their combinations requires additional research.

SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (OSF) Registration DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/RK3TE.

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Address: School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; School of Nursing & School of Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu province, China. Electronic address: [email protected].; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing, Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing, Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing, Manchester, UK; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.