Dissemination of public health research to prevent non-communicable diseases: a scoping review.

Heidi Turon, Luke Wolfenden, Meghan Finch, Sam McCrabb, Shaan Naughton, Sean R O'Connor, Ana Renda, Emily Webb, Emma Doherty, Eloise Howse, Cheryce L Harrison, Penelope Love, Natasha Smith, Rachel Sutherland, Sze Lin Yoong

Journal: BMC public health 2023;23(1):757

PMID: 37095484

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dissemination is a critical element of the knowledge translation pathway, and a necessary step to ensure research evidence is adopted and implemented by key end users in order to improve health outcomes. However, evidence-based guidance to inform dissemination activities in research is limited. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe the scientific literature examining strategies to disseminate public health evidence related to the prevention of non-communicable diseases.

METHODS

Medline, PsycInfo and EBSCO Search Ultimate were searched in May 2021 for studies published between January 2000 and the search date that reported on the dissemination of evidence to end users of public health evidence, within the context of the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Studies were synthesised according to the four components of Brownson and colleagues' Model for Dissemination of Research (source, message, channel and audience), as well as by study design.

RESULTS

Of the 107 included studies, only 14% (n = 15) directly tested dissemination strategies using experimental designs. The remainder primarily reported on dissemination preferences of different populations, or outcomes such as awareness, knowledge and intentions to adopt following evidence dissemination. Evidence related to diet, physical activity and/or obesity prevention was the most disseminated topic. Researchers were the source of disseminated evidence in over half the studies, and study findings/knowledge summaries were more frequently disseminated as the message compared to guidelines or an evidence-based program/intervention. A broad range of dissemination channels were utilised, although peer-reviewed publications/conferences and presentations/workshops predominated. Practitioners were the most commonly reported target audience.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant gap in the peer reviewed literature, with few experimental studies published that analyse and evaluate the effect of different sources, messages and target audiences on the determinants of uptake of public health evidence for prevention. Such studies are important as they can help inform and improve the effectiveness of current and future dissemination practices in public health contexts.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Address: School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. [email protected].; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia. [email protected].; School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.; Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.; Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, 3220, Australia.; School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5BN, Northern Ireland.; Population Health, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.; The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Glebe, NSW, 2037, Australia.; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.; Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences (SENS), Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.; School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.