Scoping review of telehealth use by Indigenous populations from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States.

Débora Petry Moecke, Travis Holyk, Madelaine Beckett, Sunaina Chopra, Polina Petlitsyna, Mirha Girt, Ashley Kirkham, Ivan Kamurasi, Justin Turner, Donovan Sneddon, Madeline Friesen, Ian McDonald, Nathan Denson-Camp, Stephanie Crosbie, Pat G Camp

Journal: Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2024;30(9):1398-1416

PMID: 36911983

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Telehealth has the potential to address health disparities experienced by Indigenous people, especially in remote areas. This scoping review aims to map and characterize the existing evidence on telehealth use by Indigenous people and explore the key concepts for effective use, cultural safety, and building therapeutic relationships.

METHODS

A search for published and gray literature, written in English, and published between 2000 and 2022 was completed in 17 electronic databases. Two reviewers independently screened retrieved records for eligibility. For included articles, data were extracted, categorized, and analyzed. Synthesis of findings was performed narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 321 studies were included. The most popular type of telehealth used was mHealth (44%), and the most common health focuses of the telehealth interventions were mental health (26%) and diabetes/diabetic retinopathy (13%). Frequently described barriers to effective telehealth use included concerns about privacy/confidentiality and limited internet availability; meanwhile, telehealth-usage facilitators included cultural relevance and community engagement. Although working in collaboration with Indigenous communities was the most frequently reported way to achieve cultural safety, 40% of the studies did not report Indigenous involvement. Finally, difficulty to establish trusting therapeutic relationships was a major concern raised about telehealth, and evidence suggests that having the first visit-in-person is a potential way to address this issue.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive review identified critical factors to guide the development of culturally-informed telehealth services to meet the needs of Indigenous people and to achieve equitable access and positive health outcomes.

Address: University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.; Carrier Sekani Family Services, Prince George, Canada.; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.