Claudio Ricci, Francesco Serbassi, Laura Alberici, Carlo Ingaldi, Leonardo H Eusebi, Emilio De Raffele, Loris Pironi, Anna S Sasdelli, Cristina Mosconi, Valentina Vicennati, Riccardo Casadei
Journal: HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 2023;25(10):1151-1160
PMID: 37328364
BACKGROUND
The benefits of immunonutrition (IM) in patients who underwent pancreatic surgery are unclear.
METHODS
A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing IM with standard nutrition (SN) in pancreatic surgery was carried out. A random-effects trial sequential meta-analysis was made, reporting Risk Ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and required information size (RIS). If RIS was reached, false negative (type II error) and positive results (type I error) could be excluded. The endpoints were morbidity, mortality, infectious complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates, and length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS
The meta-analysis includes 6 RCTs and 477 patients. Morbidity (RR 0.77; 0.26 to 2.25), mortality (RR 0.90; 0.76 to 1.07), and POPF rates were similar. The RISs were 17,316, 7,417, and 464,006, suggesting a type II error. Infectious complications were lower in the IM group, with a RR of 0.54 (0.36-0.79; 95 CI). The LOS was shorter in IM (MD -0.3 days; -0.6 to -0.1). For both, the RISs were reached, excluding type I error.
CONCLUSION
The IM can reduce infectious complications and LOS The small differences in mortality, morbidity, and POPF make it impossible to exclude type II error due to large RISs.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Full Text Sources:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.