Transform-Us! cluster RCT: 18-month and 30-month effects on children's physical activity, sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk markers.

Jacqui Della Gatta, David Crawford, Kylie Ball, Vicki Brown, Clare Hume, Marj Moodie, Lauren Shepphard, Mai J M Chinapaw, Paul Della Gatta, Jo Salmon, Helen Brown, David Dunstan, Robin M Daly, Kylie D Hesketh, Nicola Dawn Ridgers, Ester Cerin, Lauren Arundell

Journal: British journal of sports medicine 2023;57(5):311-319

PMID: 36428089

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Regular physical activity is beneficial to children’s physical, social and mental health. However, most children fail to meet the recommended 60+ min of moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity physical activity every day. The Transform-Us! school-based and home-based intervention was developed to determine the impact of strategies to promote children’s moderate-to-vigorous physical activity versus reduce sedentary behaviour or a combination of these strategies, on behavioural and health outcomes. The main aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the independent and combined intervention approaches to promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour on children’s moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time after 18 and 30 months compared with usual practice. This study is a 30-month 2×2 factorial design cluster randomised controlled trial delivered in 20 primary schools with additional home intervention components. After recruitment, schools were then randomly allocated to one of four groups. Results show that Transform-Us! had stronger effects on children’s sedentary behaviour than physical activity in both the physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) interventions, and there were beneficial effects on children’s adiposity for both intervention approaches. However, no clear conclusions could be drawn regarding which intervention (PA or SB) had the strongest or more consistent effects on children’s health outcomes. Authors conclude that, based on their findings, government education departments and schools should consider adopting and implementing whole-of-school programmes to promote children’s physical activity and reduce sitting through active pedagogy and supportive social and physical environments at school and home to benefit children’s sedentary time and some markers of cardiometabolic health.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy of the school- and home-based intervention on children's physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and cardiometabolic risk factor profiles.

METHODS

A 30-month 2×2 factorial design cluster randomised controlled trial delivered in 20 primary schools (148 Year 3 classes) in Melbourne, Australia (2010-2012), that used pedagogical and environmental strategies to reduce and break up SB, promote PA or a combined approach, compared with usual practice. Primary outcomes (accelerometry data; n=348) were assessed at baseline, 18 and 30 months. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) (n=564), blood pressure (BP) (n=537) and biomarkers (minimum n=206). Generalised linear mixed models estimated the interactive effects of the PA and SB interventions on the outcomes. If there was no interaction, the main effects were assessed.

RESULTS

At 18 months, there were intervention effects on children's weekday SB (-27 min, 95% CI: -47.3 to -5.3) for the PA intervention, and on children's average day PA (5.5 min, 95% CI: 0.1 to 10.8) for the SB intervention. At 30 months, there was an intervention effect for children's average day SB (-33.3 min, 95% CI: -50.6 and -16.0) for the SB intervention. Children's BMI (PA and SB groups) and systolic BP (combined group) were lower, and diastolic BP (PA group) was higher. There were positive effects on WC at both time points (SB intervention) and mixed effects on blood parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The PA and SB interventions show promise as a pragmatic approach for reducing children's SB and adiposity indicators; but achieving substantial increases in PA remains challenging.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN83725066; ACTRN12609000715279.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Address: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Geelong, Victoria, Australia [email protected].; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.; Institute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University Faculty of Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.; Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University Centre for Sport Research, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.; Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.; School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.