Nascent to novel methods to evaluate malnutrition and frailty in the surgical patient.

Carla M Prado, Katherine L Ford, M Cristina Gonzalez, Lisa C Murnane, Chelsia Gillis, Paul E Wischmeyer, Chet A Morrison, Dileep N Lobo

Journal: JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition 2023;47 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S54-S68

PMID: 36468288

Abstract

Preoperative nutrition status is an important determinant of surgical outcomes, yet malnutrition assessment is not integrated into all surgical pathways. Given its importance and the high prevalence of malnutrition in patients undergoing surgical procedures, preoperative nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention are needed to improve postoperative outcomes. This narrative review discusses novel methods to assess malnutrition and frailty in the surgical patient. The Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria are increasingly used in surgical settings although further spread and implementation are strongly encouraged to help standardize the diagnosis of malnutrition. The use of body composition (ie, reduced muscle mass) as a phenotypic criterion in GLIM may lead to a greater number of patients identified as having malnutrition, which may otherwise be undetected if screened by other diagnostic tools. Skeletal muscle loss is a defining criterion of malnutrition and frailty. Novel direct and indirect approaches to assess muscle mass in clinical settings may facilitate the identification of patients with or at risk for malnutrition. Selected imaging techniques have the additional advantage of identifying myosteatosis (an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality for surgical patients). Feasible pathways for screening and assessing frailty exist and may determine the cost/benefit of surgery, long-term independence and productivity, and the value of undertaking targeted interventions. Finally, the evaluation of nutrition risk and status is essential to predict and mitigate surgical outcomes. Nascent to novel approaches are the future of objectively identifying patients at perioperative nutrition risk and guiding therapy toward optimal perioperative standards of care.

© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Address: Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.; Postgraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; School of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.; Department of Surgery, Central Michigan University, Saginaw, Michigan, USA.; Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.