Effects of Cold-Water Immersion Compared with Other Recovery Modalities on Athletic Performance Following Acute Strenuous Exercise in Physically Active Participants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.

Emma Moore, Joel T Fuller, Clint R Bellenger, Siena Saunders, Shona L Halson, James R Broatch, Jonathan D Buckley

Journal: Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2023;53(3):687-705

PMID: 36527593

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies investigating the effects of common recovery modalities following acute strenuous exercise have reported mixed results.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression compared the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI) against other common recovery modalities on recovery of athletic performance, perceptual outcomes, and creatine kinase (CK) following acute strenuous exercise in physically active populations.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EmCare, and Embase databases were searched up until September 2022. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed, published in English, included participants who were involved in sport or deemed physically active, compared CWI with other recovery modalities following an acute bout of strenuous exercise, and included measures of performance, perceptual measures of recovery, or CK.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were meta-analysed. CWI was superior to other recovery methods for recovering from muscle soreness, and similar to other methods for recovery of muscular power and flexibility. CWI was more effective than active recovery, contrast water therapy and warm-water immersion for most recovery outcomes. Air cryotherapy was significantly more effective than CWI for the promotion of recovery of muscular strength and the immediate recovery of muscular power (1-h post-exercise). Meta-regression revealed that water temperature and exposure duration were rarely exposure moderators.

CONCLUSION

CWI is effective for promoting recovery from acute strenuous exercise in physically active populations compared with other common recovery methods.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NGP7C.

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Address: Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia. [email protected].; Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.; Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.; School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, McAuley at Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; Institute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, VIC, Australia.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.