Accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy compared with whole-breast irradiation with boost for early breast cancer: 10-year results of a GEC-ESTRO randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Kristina Lössl, Wolfgang Uter, Christine Gall, Jürgen Dunst, Ferran Guedea, Peter Niehoff, Leo Arribas, Anna Kulik, Alexandra Resch, Annika Schlamann, Rainer Fietkau, Bülent Polat, Vratislav Strnad, Michael Allgäuer, Pavel Slampa, Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez, Jose Luis Guinot, Jarosław Łyczek, Tibor Major, Hellen Knauerhase, Daniela Kauer-Dorner, Guido Hildebrandt, Oliver J Ott, Csaba Polgár

Journal: The Lancet. Oncology 2023;24(3):262-272

PMID: 36738756

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several randomised, phase 3 trials have investigated the value of different techniques of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery compared with whole-breast irradiation. In a phase 3 randomised trial, we evaluated whether APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy is non-inferior compared with whole-breast irradiation. Here, we present the 10-year follow-up results.

METHODS

We did a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial at 16 hospitals and medical centres in Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and Switzerland. Patients aged 40 years or older with early invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery were centrally randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either whole-breast irradiation or APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy. Whole-breast irradiation was delivered in 25 daily fractions of 50 Gy over 5 weeks, with a supplemental boost of 10 Gy to the tumour bed, and APBI was delivered as 30·1 Gy (seven fractions) and 32·0 Gy (eight fractions) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in 5 days or as 50 Gy of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy over 5 treatment days. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral local recurrence, analysed in the as-treated population; the non-inferiority margin for the recurrence rate difference (defined for 5-year results) was 3 percentage points. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00402519; the trial is complete.

FINDINGS

Between April 20, 2004, and July 30, 2009, 1328 female patients were randomly assigned to whole breast irradiation (n=673) or APBI (n=655), of whom 551 in the whole-breast irradiation group and 633 in the APBI group were eligible for analysis. At a median follow-up of 10·36 years (IQR 9·12-11·28), the 10-year local recurrence rates were 1·58% (95% CI 0·37 to 2·8) in the whole-breast irradiation group and 3·51% (1·99 to 5·03) in the APBI group. The difference in 10-year rates between the groups was 1·93% (95% CI -0·018 to 3·87; p=0·074). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 and 2, in 234 (60%) of 393 participants in the whole-breast irradiation group and 314 (67%) of 470 participants in the APBI group, at 7·5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both. Patients in the APBI group had a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3 late side-effects than those in the whole-breast irradiation group (17 [4%] of 393 for whole-breast irradiation vs seven [1%] of 470 for APBI; p=0·021; at 7·5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both). At 10 years, the most common type of grade 3 adverse event in both treatment groups was fibrosis (six [2%] of 313 patients for whole-breast irradiation and three [1%] of 375 patients for APBI, p=0·56). No grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths have been observed.

INTERPRETATION

Postoperative APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with early breast cancer is a valuable alternative to whole-breast irradiation in terms of treatment efficacy and is associated with fewer late side-effects.

FUNDING

German Cancer Aid, Germany.

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].; Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.; Brachytherapy Department, Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im Marii Skł odowskej, Warsaw, Poland; Podkarpacki Hospital Cancer Center Brzozów, Brzozów, Poland.; Department of Radiation Oncology, Valencian Institute of Oncology Valencia, Valencia, Spain.; Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.; Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.; Brachytherapy Department, Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im Marii Skł odowskej, Warsaw, Poland.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Sana Clinic, Offenbach, Germany.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany.; Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.