Anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in the Setting of a Nationwide Passive Epidemiological Surveillance Program.

Carla Toledo-Salinas, Selma Cecilia Scheffler-Mendoza, Lina Maria Castano-Jaramillo, José Antonio Ortega-Martell, Blanca Estela Del Rio-Navarro, Ana María Santibáñez-Copado, José Luis Díaz-Ortega, Raúl Baptista-Rosas, Paulina Sánchez-Novoa, Miguel García-Grimshaw, Sergio Iván Valdés-Ferrer, Gustavo Reyes-Terán, David Alejandro Mendoza-Hernández

Journal: Journal of clinical immunology 2022;42(8):1593-1599

PMID: 35976470

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on anaphylaxis among recipients of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the observed incidence of anaphylaxis in recipients of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

METHODS

A nationwide observational study among recipients of 61,414,803 doses of seven different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, describing the incidence and characteristics of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who developed anaphylaxis as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 15, 2021, in Mexico.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients developed anaphylaxis as an AEFI, for an overall observed incidence of 1.07 cases per 1,000,000 (95% CI 0.84-1.37) administered doses. Eighty-six percent of the patients were female, consistent with previous reports of AEFI to COVID-19 vaccines. mRNA-based vaccine recipients had the highest frequency of anaphylaxis, followed by adenovirus-vectored vaccines and inactivated virus recipients, with an observed incidence of 2.5, 0.7, and 0.2 cases per 1,000,000 doses administered, respectively. Only 46% of the patients received correct treatment with epinephrine as the first-line treatment through the appropriate route and dose. We detected one case of anaphylactic reaction-related death occurring 5 min following immunization with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 for a mortality rate of 1.5% among those who developed this AEFI.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, anaphylactic reactions were infrequent. Our study provides further evidence supporting the security of these newly developed vaccines.

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Address: Comisión Coordinadora de Institutos Nacionales de Salud Y Hospitales de Alta Especialidad, Mexico City, Mexico.; Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Insurgentes Sur 3700c, Mexico City, Mexico.; Fundación Hospital Pediátrico La Misericordia, Bogota, Colombia.; Universidad Autónoma de Hidalgo, Pachuca, Mexico.; Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.; Centro Nacional Para La Salud de La Infancia Y Adolescencia, Mexico City, Mexico.; Centro Universitario de Tonalá, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tonala, Mexico.; Hospital General de Occidente, Guadalajara, Mexico.; Coordinación de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Las Enfermedades Prevenibles Por Vacunación Y ESAVI de La Dirección General de Epidemiologia, Mexico City, Mexico.; Department of Neurology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas Y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.; Hospital General Tijuana, Tijuana, Mexico.; Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.; Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Insurgentes Sur 3700c, Mexico City, Mexico. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.