Domenica Berardi, Edmond Y W Chan, Ivan Topisirovic, Daina Avizonis, David G Watson, Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen, Sheela A Abraham, Nicholas J W Rattray, Zahra Rattray, Mahmud O Abdullah, Naser F Al-Tannak, Mohammad Al-Rofaidi, Charles Chu, Kaylee B Punter, Cian Monnin, David Papadopoli, Chelsea L Margerum, Run X Zeng
Journal: Cell reports 2022;40(7):111198
PMID: 35977476
The relationship between nutrient starvation and mitochondrial dynamics is poorly understood. We find that cells facing amino acid starvation display clear mitochondrial fusion as a means to evade mitophagy. Surprisingly, further supplementation of glutamine (Q), leucine (L), and arginine (R) did not reverse, but produced stronger mitochondrial hyperfusion. Interestingly, the hyperfusion response to Q + L + R was dependent upon mitochondrial fusion proteins Mfn1 and Opa1 but was independent of MTORC1. Metabolite profiling indicates that Q + L + R addback replenishes amino acid and nucleotide pools. Inhibition of fumarate hydratase, glutaminolysis, or inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase all block Q + L + R-dependent mitochondrial hyperfusion, which suggests critical roles for the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and purine biosynthesis in this response. Metabolic tracer analyses further support the idea that supplemented Q promotes purine biosynthesis by serving as a donor of amine groups. We thus describe a metabolic mechanism for direct sensing of cellular amino acids to control mitochondrial fusion and cell fate.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.